Suppr超能文献

用于鸡行为观察的扫描取样方法选择的新方法及其实际意义。

New approaches to selecting a scan-sampling method for chicken behavioral observations and their practical implications.

作者信息

Cartoni Mancinelli Alice, Trocino Angela, Menchetti Laura, Chiattelli Diletta, Ciarelli Claudia, Castellini Cesare

机构信息

Department of Agricultural, Food and Environmental Sciences, University of Perugia, 06100, Perugia, Italy.

Department of Agronomy Food Natural Resources Animal and Environment (DAFNAE), University of Padova, Viale dell'Università 16, 35020, Legnaro, Padua, Italy.

出版信息

Sci Rep. 2023 Oct 11;13(1):17177. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-44126-2.

Abstract

The use of the scan-sampling method, especially when a large amount of data is collected, has become widespread in behavioral studies. However, there are no specific guidelines regarding the choice of the sampling interval in different conditions. Thus, establishing a standard approach for video analysis represents an important step forward within the scientific community. In the present work, we hypothesized that the length of the sampling interval could influence the results of chicken behavioral study, for which we evaluated the reliability, accuracy, and validity of three different sampling intervals (10, 15 and 30 min). The Bland-Altman test was proposed as an innovative approach to compare sampling intervals and support researcher choices. Moreover, these sampling intervals were applied to compare the behavior of 4 chicken genotypes kept under free-range conditions. The Bland-Altman plots suggested that sampling intervals greater than 10 min lead to biases in the estimation of rare behaviors, such as "Attacking". In contrast, the 30-min sampling interval was able to detect differences among genotypes in high-occurrence behaviors, such as those associated with locomotory activity. Thus, from a practical viewpoint, when a broad characterization of chicken genotypes is required, the 30-min scan-sampling interval might be suggested as a good compromise between resources and results.

摘要

扫描取样法的应用,尤其是在收集大量数据时,已在行为研究中广泛使用。然而,对于不同条件下取样间隔的选择尚无具体指导原则。因此,建立一种视频分析的标准方法是科学界向前迈出的重要一步。在本研究中,我们假设取样间隔的时长可能会影响鸡行为研究的结果,为此我们评估了三种不同取样间隔(10分钟、15分钟和30分钟)的可靠性、准确性和有效性。提出了布兰德-奥特曼检验作为一种创新方法来比较取样间隔并为研究人员的选择提供支持。此外,应用这些取样间隔来比较4种放养条件下鸡基因型的行为。布兰德-奥特曼图表明,大于10分钟的取样间隔会导致对罕见行为(如“攻击”)估计的偏差。相比之下,30分钟的取样间隔能够检测出高发生率行为(如与运动活动相关的行为)中基因型之间的差异。因此,从实际角度来看,当需要对鸡基因型进行广泛表征时,30分钟的扫描取样间隔可能是资源与结果之间的一个良好折衷方案。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cae9/10567684/228c17353861/41598_2023_44126_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验