Singh Rahul Kumar, Yadav Dibya, Misra Shilpi, Singh Amrendra K
Department of Chemistry, Indian Institute of Technology Indore, Indore 453552, India.
Centre for Scientific and Applied Research, IPS Academy, Indore 452012, India.
Dalton Trans. 2023 Nov 7;52(43):15878-15895. doi: 10.1039/d3dt03149g.
An unexpected reversal in catalytic activity for acceptorless dehydrogenative coupling compared to acceptorless alcohol dehydrogenation has been observed using a series of cationic Ru(II)-CNC pincer complexes with different ancillary ligands. In continuation of our study of cationic Ru(II)-CNC pincer complexes 1a-6a, new complexes with bulky -wingtips [Ru(CNC)(CO)(PPh)Br]PF (1b), [Ru(CNC)(CO)(PPh)Cl]PF (1c), [Ru(CNC)(CO)(PPh)H]PF (2c), [Ru(CNC)(PPh)Cl]PF (3b), [Ru(CNC)(PPh)Cl]PF (3c), [Ru(CNC)(PPh)H]PF (4b), [Ru(CNC)(PPh)H]PF (4c), [Ru(CNC)(DMSO)Cl]PF (6b), and [Ru(CNC)(DMSO)Cl]PF (6c) [CNC = 2,6-bis(1-alkylimidazol-2-ylidene)-pyridine] have been synthesized and the catalytic activities of the new complexes have been compared with their -methyl analogues for transfer hydrogenation of cyclohexanone and acceptorless dehydrogenation of benzyl alcohol. Furthermore, all complexes have been utilized as catalysts in the dehydrogenative coupling reaction of benzyl alcohol with amines. While the catalytic activities of the new complexes for transfer hydrogenation and acceptorless alcohol dehydrogenation were found to be in line with the previously observed trend based on the ancillary ligands (CO > COD > DMSO > PPh), for the acceptorless dehydrogenative coupling reaction, complexes containing PPh and DMSO ligands performed better compared to complexes containing CO and COD ligands. Based on NMR and mass investigation of catalytic reactions, a plausible mechanism has been suggested to explain the difference in catalytic activity and its reversal during the dehydrogenative coupling reaction. Furthermore, the substrate scope for the dehydrogenative coupling reaction of benzyl alcohol with a wide range of amines has been explored, including synthesizing some pharmaceutically important imines. All new complexes have been characterized by various spectroscopic techniques, and the structures of 4b and 6b have been confirmed by the single-crystal X-ray diffraction technique.
使用一系列带有不同辅助配体的阳离子Ru(II)-CNC钳形配合物,观察到与无受体醇脱氢反应相比,无受体脱氢偶联反应的催化活性出现了意外的反转。在我们对阳离子Ru(II)-CNC钳形配合物1a - 6a的研究基础上,合成了具有庞大翼尖的新配合物[Ru(CNC)(CO)(PPh)Br]PF(1b)、[Ru(CNC)(CO)(PPh)Cl]PF(1c)、[Ru(CNC)(CO)(PPh)H]PF(2c)、[Ru(CNC)(PPh)Cl]PF(3b)、[Ru(CNC)(PPh)Cl]PF(3c)、[Ru(CNC)(PPh)H]PF(4b)、[Ru(CNC)(PPh)H]PF(4c)、[Ru(CNC)(DMSO)Cl]PF(6b)和[Ru(CNC)(DMSO)Cl]PF(6c)[CNC = 2,6-双(1-烷基咪唑-2-亚基)-吡啶],并将这些新配合物的催化活性与其甲基类似物用于环己酮的转移氢化反应和苯甲醇的无受体脱氢反应进行了比较。此外,所有配合物都已用作苯甲醇与胺的脱氢偶联反应的催化剂。虽然发现新配合物在转移氢化和无受体醇脱氢反应中的催化活性与基于辅助配体(CO > COD > DMSO > PPh)先前观察到的趋势一致,但对于无受体脱氢偶联反应,含有PPh和DMSO配体的配合物比含有CO和COD配体的配合物表现更好。基于催化反应的核磁共振和质谱研究,提出了一个合理的机理来解释催化活性的差异及其在脱氢偶联反应过程中的反转。此外,还探索了苯甲醇与多种胺的脱氢偶联反应的底物范围,包括合成一些具有药学重要性的亚胺。所有新配合物都通过各种光谱技术进行了表征,4b和6b的结构已通过单晶X射线衍射技术得到证实。