Department of Cardiology, University of California, San Francisco, California.
Department of Cardiology, University of California, San Francisco, California.
Am J Cardiol. 2023 Dec 1;208:118-123. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2023.09.045. Epub 2023 Oct 12.
Transcatheter patent foramen ovale (PFO) closure is indicated for patients with cryptogenic stroke. Although procedural safety is well established, there are limited data on the safety of same-day (SD) discharge. We aimed to review the outcomes of PFO closure with SD. Patients who underwent transcatheter PFO closure between January 2011 and May 2022 at 4 large US hospitals were retrospectively analyzed, comparing outcomes of SD versus delayed discharge (DD). The primary end point was a composite of access-site complication, stroke, device embolization, atrial arrhythmia, and bleeding. Secondary analysis comparing imaging modality and outcomes was performed. 554 patients (49.2% female) were analyzed (382 discharged SD). Average age was 54.3 ± 15. Baseline characteristics in both groups were broadly similar. Previous stroke (78.0% SD vs 76.2% DD, p = 0.32) was the commonest indication for PFO closure. In the SD group, there was less general anesthesia use (5.5% vs 16.9%, p <0.001). Intraprocedural intracardiac echocardiography was used more frequently in SD cases (95.0% vs 81.4%, p <0.001). In the DD group, median stay was 1 night, and 34.9% stayed beyond 1 night. At 30 days, there was no difference in the primary composite end point (14.9% vs 11.6%, p = 0.15). There was no inter-group difference in individual adverse events (all p >0.05). When comparing imaging modality and outcomes, there was no difference in composite end points between transesophageal and intracardiac echocardiography (6.5% vs 14.7%, p = 0.063). In conclusion, SD discharge after transcatheter PFO closure appears safe. This efficient approach may be advantageous in optimizing workflow and minimizing hospital occupancy.
经导管卵圆孔未闭(PFO)封堵术适用于隐源性卒中患者。虽然程序安全性已得到充分证实,但关于同日(SD)出院的安全性数据有限。我们旨在回顾 PFO 封堵术后 SD 出院的结果。回顾性分析了 2011 年 1 月至 2022 年 5 月在美国 4 家大医院接受经导管 PFO 封堵术的患者,比较了 SD 出院与延迟出院(DD)的结果。主要终点是经皮穿刺部位并发症、卒、器械栓塞、房性心律失常和出血的复合终点。进行了比较影像学方式和结果的二次分析。分析了 554 例患者(49.2%为女性),其中 382 例患者 SD 出院。两组患者的平均年龄均为 54.3±15 岁。两组患者的基线特征大致相似。PFO 封堵的最常见适应证是既往卒中(78.0% SD 与 76.2% DD,p=0.32)。SD 组全身麻醉使用率较低(5.5%与 16.9%,p<0.001)。SD 病例中更频繁使用术中经食管超声心动图(95.0%与 81.4%,p<0.001)。DD 组的中位住院时间为 1 天,34.9%的患者住院时间超过 1 天。30 天时,主要复合终点无差异(14.9%与 11.6%,p=0.15)。两组间个别不良事件无差异(所有 p>0.05)。在比较影像学方式和结果时,经食管超声心动图和经心内超声心动图之间的复合终点无差异(6.5%与 14.7%,p=0.063)。总之,经导管 PFO 封堵术后 SD 出院似乎是安全的。这种高效的方法可能有利于优化工作流程和减少医院占用率。