Liu Wenqi, Sun Xuemei, Gao Yinyan, Sun Hui, Feng Hui, Tan Hongzhuan, Chen Qiong, Peng Linlin, Wu Irene Xy
Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Xiangya School of Public Health, Central South University, Changsha, Hunan, China.
Xiangya Nursing School, Central South University, Changsha, Hunan, China.
Arch Gerontol Geriatr. 2024 Jan;116:105214. doi: 10.1016/j.archger.2023.105214. Epub 2023 Sep 27.
To compare the effectiveness of existing nonsurgical interventions to improve or cure urinary incontinence in older women.
Five English databases (Medline, EMBASE, Web of Science, PsychINFO and the Cochrane Library) were searched from January 1, 2018, until August 27, 2023. Studies published before 2018 were directly extracted from a review published in 2019 on a similar research question. Three Chinese databases (China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI), Wanfang and SinoMed) were searched from January 1, 2000, until August 27, 2023. Randomized controlled trials of nonsurgical interventions for women aged ≥ 60 years with urinary incontinence were considered eligible. The primary outcome was the rate of improvement and cure. Pairwise meta-analysis and network meta-analysis were performed, with the pooled risk ratio (RR) and 95 % confidence interval (CI) being reported.
There were 15 intervention categories among the included 32 randomized controlled trials for older women with urinary incontinence. The combination of behavioral therapy with other interventions, including Chinese herbal medicine, electrical stimulation, and acupuncture were effective for both improvement and cure rates. Behavioral therapy plus Chinese herbal medicine was the most effective intervention category for both improvement and cure rates.
Behavioral therapy plus Chinese herbal medicine was currently the optimal selection for the management of older women with urinary incontinence. However, the clinicians should carefully consider the effectiveness and quality of evidence because of the limited quality and quantity of the randomized controlled trials included.
比较现有非手术干预措施改善或治愈老年女性尿失禁的效果。
检索了五个英文数据库(Medline、EMBASE、Web of Science、PsychINFO和Cochrane图书馆),时间跨度为2018年1月1日至2023年8月27日。2018年之前发表的研究直接从2019年发表的一篇关于类似研究问题的综述中提取。检索了三个中文数据库(中国知网(CNKI)、万方和中国生物医学文献数据库(SinoMed)),时间跨度为2000年1月1日至2023年8月27日。纳入年龄≥60岁、患有尿失禁的女性非手术干预的随机对照试验被视为合格。主要结局是改善率和治愈率。进行了成对荟萃分析和网状荟萃分析,并报告了合并风险比(RR)和95%置信区间(CI)。
在纳入的32项老年女性尿失禁随机对照试验中,有15种干预类别。行为疗法与其他干预措施(包括中药、电刺激和针灸)相结合对改善率和治愈率均有效。行为疗法加中药是改善率和治愈率方面最有效的干预类别。
行为疗法加中药目前是老年女性尿失禁管理的最佳选择。然而,由于纳入的随机对照试验质量和数量有限,临床医生应仔细考虑证据的有效性和质量。