Suppr超能文献

间隔两天的分散式再培训计划可提高基于模拟的基本关节镜技能的习得和保持效果。

A spaced retraining schedule with 2-day interval improves the acquisition and retention of simulation-based basic arthroscopic skills.

作者信息

Yang Weihao, Li Wei, Guo Congyue, Wang Zihe, Wu Shangxing, Feng Lei, Yang Zhouwen, Xie Xiaobo, Tian Jing

机构信息

Department of Orthopedics, Zhujiang Hospital, Southern Medical University, 253 Industrial Avenue, Haizhu, Guangzhou, 510280, China.

Department of Radiology, Zhujiang Hospital, Southern Medical University, 253 Industrial Avenue, Haizhu, Guangzhou, 510280, China.

出版信息

Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2023 Dec;31(12):5546-5553. doi: 10.1007/s00167-023-07618-2. Epub 2023 Oct 14.

Abstract

PURPOSE

To compare the effect of three differently spaced retraining schedules (1-day, 2-day, and 1-week intervals) on the acquisition of basic arthroscopic skills and skill retention after 3 months.

METHODS

Thirty orthopaedic residents without arthroscopic experience were enrolled in a double-blind, randomised, parallel-controlled trial. Spaced retaining schedules were divided into massed training and retraining phases. Participants were required to obtain perfect scores in all tasks on the simulator in the massed training phase, followed by a pretest to evaluate the training effect. During the retraining phase, participants were randomly assigned to Groups A (1-day interval), B (2-day interval) or C (1-week interval). A posttest was used to evaluate the effect of different retraining patterns. Follow-up evaluations were conducted at 1 week, 1 month and 3 months after the completion of spaced retraining schedules to measure skill retention. One-way ANOVA and paired-sample t tests were used for statistical analysis.

RESULTS

Significant between-group differences in diagnostic arthroscopy (137.0 ± 24.8 vs. 140.1 ± 21.3 vs. 175.3 ± 27.4 s, P = 0.005, P = 0.010) and loose body removal (193.1 ± 33.9 vs. 182.0 ± 32.1 vs. 228.7 ± 42.9 s, P = 0.025) completion times were observed. No significant differences were found in other posttest metrics. An assessment of skill retention after the 3-month follow-up (Evaluation 3) showed significant differences in diagnostic arthroscopy completion time (202.5 ± 53.3 vs. 172.0 ± 27.2 vs. 225.5 ± 42.1 s, P = 0.026). No significant differences were found in other Evaluation 3 metrics.

CONCLUSION

The 2-day retraining schedule was the most effective for the acquisition and retention of basic arthroscopic skills and could be integrated into arthroscopic skills curricula. After a 3-month follow-up, residents who followed this schedule showed better skill retention than those who followed the 1-week interval schedule.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level I.

摘要

目的

比较三种不同间隔的再训练计划(1天、2天和1周间隔)对基础关节镜技能习得及3个月后技能保持情况的影响。

方法

30名无关节镜经验的骨科住院医师参与一项双盲、随机、平行对照试验。间隔式再训练计划分为集中训练阶段和再训练阶段。参与者在集中训练阶段需在模拟器上的所有任务中获得满分,随后进行预测试以评估训练效果。在再训练阶段,参与者被随机分配至A组(1天间隔)、B组(2天间隔)或C组(1周间隔)。采用后测试评估不同再训练模式的效果。在间隔式再训练计划完成后的1周、1个月和3个月进行随访评估以测量技能保持情况。采用单因素方差分析和配对样本t检验进行统计分析。

结果

在诊断性关节镜检查(137.0±24.8 vs. 140.1±21.3 vs. 175.3±27.4秒,P = 0.005,P = 0.010)和游离体取出(193.1±33.9 vs. 182.0±32.1 vs. 228.7±42.9秒,P = 0.025)的完成时间上观察到显著的组间差异。在后测试的其他指标中未发现显著差异。3个月随访(评估3)后的技能保持情况评估显示,诊断性关节镜检查完成时间存在显著差异(202.5±53.3 vs. 172.0±27.2 vs. 225.5±42.1秒,P = 0.026)。在评估3的其他指标中未发现显著差异。

结论

2天的再训练计划对基础关节镜技能的习得和保持最为有效,可纳入关节镜技能课程。3个月随访后,遵循该计划的住院医师比遵循1周间隔计划者表现出更好的技能保持情况。

证据级别

I级。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验