Nian Qinghua, Hardesty Jeffrey J, Crespi Elizabeth, Sinamo Joshua K, Kennedy Ryan D, Welding Kevin, Cohen Joanna E
Institute for Global Tobacco Control, Department of Health, Behavior and Society, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, United States.
Tob Induc Dis. 2023 Oct 13;21:134. doi: 10.18332/tid/171354. eCollection 2023.
Electronic nicotine delivery system (ENDS) and liquid characteristics affect nicotine and toxicant exposure and use behaviors. Little is known about how adults who frequently use ENDS transition between ENDS device/liquid groupings.
A total of 379 US adults (≥21 years) using ENDS frequently (≥5 days/week) self-reported and uploaded photos of their most used ENDS device and liquid in three waves of online surveys (May 2020 - November 2021). Device/liquid grouping was defined by device (i.e. disposable/refillable tank/refillable pod or cartridge/disposable pod or cartridge, adjustable/no adjustable settings) and liquid (i.e. salt/freebase) characteristics. Participants using the same grouping across waves were considered stable users.
The most prevalent wave (W) 1 grouping was tank (freebase, adjustable settings; 36.8%). From W1 to W3, the number of disposable device (salt, no adjustable settings) users increased 156.4% and the number of disposable pod/cartridge (salt, no adjustable settings) users decreased 15.2%. In W2 and W3, compared to stable users, participants using tank (freebase, adjustable settings) in W1 and another grouping in W2 and/or W3 reported significantly higher nicotine concentrations (mg/mL) (W2: 15.1 vs 5.5, p<0.001; W3: 22.9 vs 5.6, p<0.001) and lower device power (watt) (W2: 46.8 vs 58.7, p=0.02; W3: 34.0 vs 57.2, p<0.001).
Over a 1.5-year period, a rapid growth in disposable device (salt, no adjustable settings) use and a decrease in disposable pod/cartridge (salt, no adjustable settings) use were observed. Participants who transitioned from tank (freebase, adjustable settings) to other groupings were more likely to increase liquid nicotine concentration and reduce device power compared to stable users.
电子尼古丁传送系统(ENDS)和烟液特性会影响尼古丁及有毒物质的接触情况和使用行为。对于经常使用ENDS的成年人在ENDS设备/烟液类别之间如何转换,我们了解甚少。
共有379名美国成年人(≥21岁)经常使用ENDS(≥每周5天),他们在三轮在线调查(2020年5月至2021年11月)中自行报告并上传了他们最常用的ENDS设备和烟液的照片。设备/烟液类别由设备(即一次性/可再填充储液罐/可再填充烟弹或笔芯/一次性烟弹或笔芯、可调节/不可调节设置)和烟液(即盐基/游离碱)特性定义。在各轮调查中使用相同类别的参与者被视为稳定使用者。
最普遍的第1轮(W1)类别是储液罐(游离碱,可调节设置;36.8%)。从W1到W3,一次性设备(盐基,不可调节设置)使用者数量增加了156.4%,一次性烟弹/笔芯(盐基,不可调节设置)使用者数量减少了15.2%。在W2和W3中,与稳定使用者相比,在W1中使用储液罐(游离碱,可调节设置)且在W2和/或W3中使用其他类别的参与者报告称,其尼古丁浓度(毫克/毫升)显著更高(W2:15.1对5.5;p<0.001;W3:22.9对5.6;p<0.001)且设备功率(瓦特)更低(W2:46.8对58.7;p=0.02;W3:34.0对57.2;p<0.001)。
在1.5年的时间里,观察到一次性设备(盐基,不可调节设置)的使用迅速增加,而一次性烟弹/笔芯(盐基,不可调节设置)的使用减少。与稳定使用者相比,从储液罐(游离碱,可调节设置)转换到其他类别的参与者更有可能提高烟液尼古丁浓度并降低设备功率。