Suppr超能文献

优化连续输注头孢他啶-阿维巴坦的药代动力学/药效学目标达标率能否成为避免深部 DTR 革兰氏阴性感染靶向治疗中联合治疗的一种方法?

Could an optimized joint pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic target attainment of continuous infusion ceftazidime-avibactam be a way to avoid the need for combo therapy in the targeted treatment of deep-seated DTR Gram-negative infections?

机构信息

Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences, Alma Mater Studiorum University of Bologna , Bologna, Italy.

Clinical Pharmacology Unit, Department for Integrated Infectious Risk Management, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna , Bologna, Italy.

出版信息

Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2023 Nov 15;67(11):e0096923. doi: 10.1128/aac.00969-23. Epub 2023 Oct 16.

Abstract

The objective of this study was to assess the relationship between joint pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic (PK/PD) target attainment of continuous infusion (CI) ceftazidime-avibactam and the microbiological outcome of documented difficult-to-treat resistant (DTR) Gram-negative infections. A 2-year retrospective cohort study was performed in patients receiving CI ceftazidime-avibactam mono- or combo therapy for documented DTR Gram-negative infections and undergoing therapeutic drug monitoring of both ceftazidime and avibactam. The free fractions of steady-state concentrations (C) of ceftazidime and avibactam were calculated. The joint PK/PD target was considered optimal when both the C/MIC ratio for ceftazidime ≥4 (equivalent to 100% T) and the C/C ratio for avibactam >1 (equivalent to 100% T >C of 4.0 mg/L) were simultaneously achieved (quasi-optimal if only one of the two and suboptimal if neither of the two was achieved). Multivariate logistic regression analysis was applied for testing potential variables associated with microbiological failure. Fifty-eight patients were treated with CI ceftazidime-avibactam mono- (36) or combo therapy (22) for documented DTR Gram-negative infections [74.2% for primary or secondary bloodstream infections (BSIs)]. Combo therapy was administered more frequently to intensive care unit (ICU) patients ( = 0.023) or for pneumonia ( = 0.001) and less frequently for intra-abdominal infections and BSIs ( = 0.04). Microbiological failure occurred in five cases (8.6%, three in mono- and two in combo therapy). In the multivariate analysis, the suboptimal/quasi-optimal joint PK/PD target emerged as the only independent predictor of microbiological failure (odds ratio [OR] 11.11; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.31-93.98; = 0.023), whereas monotherapy was not ( = 0.99). Optimized joint PK/PD target attainment of CI ceftazidime-avibactam monotherapy could represent a way forward for allowing microbiological eradication of DTR Gram-negative infections and could render unnecessary combo therapy.

摘要

本研究旨在评估连续输注(CI)头孢他啶-阿维巴坦的药代动力学/药效学(PK/PD)目标与已确诊的难治疗耐药(DTR)革兰氏阴性感染的微生物学结果之间的关系。对接受 CI 头孢他啶-阿维巴坦单药或联合治疗已确诊的 DTR 革兰氏阴性感染并进行头孢他啶和阿维巴坦治疗药物监测的患者进行了为期 2 年的回顾性队列研究。计算了稳态浓度(C)的游离分数。当头孢他啶的 C/MIC 比值≥4(相当于 100%T)和阿维巴坦的 C/C 比值>1(相当于 100%T >C 为 4.0mg/L)同时达到时,联合 PK/PD 目标被认为是最佳的(如果仅达到两个目标中的一个,则为准最佳,如果两个目标均未达到,则为次最佳)。应用多变量逻辑回归分析测试与微生物学失败相关的潜在变量。58 例患者接受 CI 头孢他啶-阿维巴坦单药(36 例)或联合治疗(22 例)治疗已确诊的 DTR 革兰氏阴性感染[74.2%为原发性或继发性血流感染(BSI)]。联合治疗更多地用于重症监护病房(ICU)患者(=0.023)或肺炎(=0.001),而较少用于腹腔内感染和 BSI(=0.04)。5 例(8.6%,单药治疗 3 例,联合治疗 2 例)发生微生物学失败。在多变量分析中,次最佳/准最佳联合 PK/PD 目标是微生物学失败的唯一独立预测因子(比值比[OR]11.11;95%置信区间[CI]1.31-93.98;=0.023),而单药治疗不是(=0.99)。CI 头孢他啶-阿维巴坦单药治疗的优化联合 PK/PD 目标的实现可能是消除 DTR 革兰氏阴性感染的微生物学的一种方法,并使联合治疗变得不必要。

相似文献

9
A novel method to evaluate ceftazidime/avibactam therapy in patients with carbapenemase-producing Enterobactericeae (CPE) bloodstream infections.
Int J Antimicrob Agents. 2023 Apr;61(4):106760. doi: 10.1016/j.ijantimicag.2023.106760. Epub 2023 Feb 18.

引用本文的文献

1
producing AmpC DHA-1 bacteraemia in neutropenic leukemic patient: continuous infusion ceftazidime/avibactam as a carbapenem sparing regimen.
JAC Antimicrob Resist. 2025 Jun 18;7(3):dlaf109. doi: 10.1093/jacamr/dlaf109. eCollection 2025 Jun.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验