Suppr超能文献

铜基抗菌表面采样方法的比较。

comparison of methods for sampling copper-based antimicrobial surfaces.

机构信息

Division of Medical Microbiology and Infection Prevention, Vancouver Coastal Health , Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.

Department of Materials Engineering, University of British Columbia , Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.

出版信息

Microbiol Spectr. 2023 Dec 12;11(6):e0244123. doi: 10.1128/spectrum.02441-23. Epub 2023 Oct 17.

Abstract

Self-sanitizing surfaces such as copper (Cu) are increasingly used on high-touch surfaces to prevent the spread of harmful viruses and bacteria. Being able to monitor the antimicrobial properties of Cu is fundamental in measuring its antimicrobial efficacy. Thorough investigations into reliable methods to enumerate bacteria from self-sanitizing surfaces are lacking in the literature. This study demonstrates that direct use of Petrifilm on Cu surfaces most likely revives stressed and dying bacteria, which induces increased bacterial counts. This phenomenon was not observed with indirect collection methods. Studies assessing time-kill kinetics or long-term efficacy of Cu should consider the impact of the collection method chosen.

摘要

自清洁表面(如铜(Cu))越来越多地用于高接触表面,以防止有害病毒和细菌的传播。能够监测 Cu 的抗菌性能是衡量其抗菌效果的基础。文献中缺乏对从自清洁表面计数细菌的可靠方法的彻底研究。本研究表明,直接在 Cu 表面使用 Petrifilm 很可能会使受压力和垂死的细菌复活,从而导致细菌计数增加。间接收集方法则没有观察到这种现象。评估 Cu 的杀菌动力学或长期功效的研究应考虑所选择的收集方法的影响。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c912/10714924/8e5714a35ab6/spectrum.02441-23.f001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验