Hobbiss Michael H, Lavie Nilli
Institute of Cognitive Neuroscience, University College London, London WC1N 3AZ, UK.
Institute of Cognitive Neuroscience, University College London, London WC1N 3AZ, UK.
J Exp Child Psychol. 2024 Feb;238:105784. doi: 10.1016/j.jecp.2023.105784. Epub 2023 Oct 18.
Despite much research into the development of attention in adolescence, mixed results and between-task differences have precluded clear conclusions regarding the relative early or late maturation of attention abilities. Moreover, although adolescents constantly face the need to pay attention at school, it remains unclear whether laboratory measures of attention can predict their ability to sustain attention focus during lessons. Therefore, here we devised a task that was sensitive to measure both sustained and selective attention and tested whether task measures could predict adolescents' levels of inattention during lessons. In total, 166 adolescents (aged 12-17 years) and 50 adults performed a sustained selective attention task, searching for letter targets while ignoring salient yet entirely irrelevant distractor faces, under different levels of perceptual load-an established determinant of attention in adults. Inattention levels during a just preceding classroom lesson were measured using a novel self-report classroom distractibility checklist. The results established that sustained attention (measured with response variability) continued to develop throughout adolescence across perceptual load levels. In contrast, there was an earlier maturation of the effect of perceptual load on selective attention; load modulation of distractor interference was larger in the early adolescence period compared with later periods. Both distractor interference and response variability were significant unique predictors of distractibility in the classroom, including when controlling for interest in the lesson and cognitive aptitude. Overall, the results demonstrate divergence of development of sustained and selective attention in adolescence and establish both as significant predictors of attention in the important educational setting of school lessons.
尽管针对青少年注意力发展进行了大量研究,但结果参差不齐以及不同任务间存在差异,使得难以就注意力能力相对早熟或晚熟得出明确结论。此外,尽管青少年在学校始终面临着集中注意力的需求,但尚不清楚实验室注意力测量能否预测他们在课堂上保持注意力集中的能力。因此,我们设计了一项任务,该任务能够灵敏地测量持续注意力和选择性注意力,并测试任务测量能否预测青少年在课堂上的注意力不集中程度。共有166名青少年(年龄在12至17岁之间)和50名成年人进行了一项持续选择性注意力任务,即在不同感知负荷水平下搜索字母目标,同时忽略突出但完全不相关的干扰面孔,感知负荷是成人注意力的一个既定决定因素。使用一份新颖的自我报告课堂注意力分散检查表测量紧接之前一堂课的注意力不集中程度。结果表明,在整个青春期,持续注意力(通过反应变异性测量)在不同感知负荷水平下持续发展。相比之下,感知负荷对选择性注意力的影响成熟得更早;与后期相比,青春期早期干扰物干扰的负荷调制更大。干扰物干扰和反应变异性都是课堂上注意力分散程度的显著独特预测因素,包括在控制对课程的兴趣和认知能力时。总体而言,结果表明青春期持续注意力和选择性注意力的发展存在差异,并确定两者都是学校课程这一重要教育环境中注意力的重要预测因素。