• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

住院创伤患者出院后静脉血栓栓塞症预防:接受与未接受出院后预防的患者的回顾性比较。

Post-discharge venous thromboembolism prophylaxis in hospitalized trauma patients: A retrospective comparison of patients receiving versus not receiving post-discharge prophylaxis.

机构信息

Intermountain Medical Center, Department of Pharmacy, USA.

Intermountain Medical Center, Department of Trauma and Surgical Critical Care, USA.

出版信息

Am J Surg. 2024 Feb;228:247-251. doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2023.10.032. Epub 2023 Oct 14.

DOI:10.1016/j.amjsurg.2023.10.032
PMID:37863796
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Risk of venous thromboembolism (VTE) in many trauma patients extends beyond hospitalization, but there is a paucity of evidence to guide the use of post-discharge prophylaxis (PDP).

METHODS

A retrospective cohort study of trauma patients deemed moderate-to-high risk for VTE (risk assessment profile score [RAP] ≥5) who were prescribed PDP based on an internal clinical guideline assessing injury pattern and mobility status. PDP patients were compared with those that did not receive post-discharge prophylaxis (NPDP).

RESULTS

1512 patients were included. PDP group had higher mean RAP score (7.3 vs. 6.4, p ​< ​0.001), more likely to have a complex orthopedic fracture and underwent a longer median hospital (4.7 vs. 2.9 days, p ​< ​0.001). No difference between groups in 90-day VTE (11 [1.5 ​%] (PDP) vs. 8 [1.0 ​%] (NPDP), p ​= ​0.50), clinically relevant bleeding (p ​= ​0.58), or readmission (p ​= ​0.46).

CONCLUSIONS

VTE incidence, clinically relevant bleeding, and readmission 90-days after hospital discharge were low and similar between PDP and NPDP groups. PDP prescribed in a presumably higher VTE risk trauma population may mitigate the long-term risk of VTE.

摘要

背景

许多创伤患者的静脉血栓栓塞(VTE)风险超出了住院期,但缺乏指导出院后预防(PDP)使用的证据。

方法

这是一项回顾性队列研究,纳入了被认为有中高度 VTE 风险(风险评估谱评分[RAP]≥5)的创伤患者,这些患者根据内部临床指南评估损伤模式和活动能力状态来开具 PDP。将 PDP 患者与未接受出院后预防(NPDP)的患者进行比较。

结果

共纳入 1512 名患者。PDP 组的平均 RAP 评分更高(7.3 比 6.4,p<0.001),更有可能患有复杂的骨科骨折,并接受了更长的中位住院时间(4.7 比 2.9 天,p<0.001)。两组在 90 天 VTE(11 [1.5%](PDP)与 8 [1.0%](NPDP),p=0.50)、有临床意义的出血(p=0.58)或再入院(p=0.46)方面无差异。

结论

出院后 90 天内 VTE 的发生率、有临床意义的出血和再入院率较低,且 PDP 组和 NPDP 组之间相似。在 VTE 风险较高的创伤人群中开具 PDP 可能会降低长期 VTE 的风险。

相似文献

1
Post-discharge venous thromboembolism prophylaxis in hospitalized trauma patients: A retrospective comparison of patients receiving versus not receiving post-discharge prophylaxis.住院创伤患者出院后静脉血栓栓塞症预防:接受与未接受出院后预防的患者的回顾性比较。
Am J Surg. 2024 Feb;228:247-251. doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2023.10.032. Epub 2023 Oct 14.
2
Use of post-discharge heparin prophylaxis and the risk of venous thromboembolism and bleeding following bariatric surgery.减重手术后出院后肝素预防的使用与静脉血栓栓塞和出血的风险。
Surg Endosc. 2021 Oct;35(10):5531-5537. doi: 10.1007/s00464-020-08049-7. Epub 2020 Oct 6.
3
Venous thromboembolism prophylaxis for medical service-mostly cancer-patients at hospital discharge.医疗机构出院后癌症患者的静脉血栓栓塞症预防。
Am J Med. 2011 Dec;124(12):1143-50. doi: 10.1016/j.amjmed.2011.07.031.
4
Venous Thromboembolism Prophylaxis in Otolaryngologic Patients Using Caprini Assessment.Caprini 评估在耳鼻喉科患者中预防静脉血栓栓塞症的应用。
Laryngoscope. 2024 Mar;134(3):1169-1182. doi: 10.1002/lary.31041. Epub 2023 Sep 23.
5
Venous Thromboembolism Among Hospitalized Patients: Incidence and Adequacy of Thromboprophylaxis - A Retrospective Study.住院患者静脉血栓栓塞症:发生率和血栓预防的充分性——一项回顾性研究。
Vasc Health Risk Manag. 2022 Jul 24;18:575-587. doi: 10.2147/VHRM.S370344. eCollection 2022.
6
Can Risk-Based Thromboprophylaxis Practice Guidelines be Safely Used in Esophagectomy Cases? Experience of an Academic Health System.基于风险的血栓预防实践指南能否安全用于食管癌切除病例?一个学术医疗系统的经验。
J Gastrointest Surg. 2023 Oct;27(10):2045-2056. doi: 10.1007/s11605-023-05815-5. Epub 2023 Sep 5.
7
Comparison of inpatient versus post-discharge venous thromboembolic events after spinal surgery: A single institution series of 6869 consecutive patients.脊柱手术后住院与出院后静脉血栓栓塞事件的比较:单中心 6869 例连续患者系列。
Clin Neurol Neurosurg. 2020 Sep;196:105982. doi: 10.1016/j.clineuro.2020.105982. Epub 2020 Jun 2.
8
Extended Venous Thromboembolism Prophylaxis in Medically Ill Patients: An NATF Anticoagulation Action Initiative.内科疾病患者的静脉血栓栓塞症延伸预防:NATF 抗凝行动倡议。
Am J Med. 2020 May;133 Suppl 1:1-27. doi: 10.1016/j.amjmed.2019.12.001.
9
Retrospective Evaluation of Venous Thromboembolism Prophylaxis in Elderly, High-Risk Trauma Patients.回顾性评估老年、高危创伤患者的静脉血栓栓塞预防。
J Surg Res. 2020 May;249:225-231. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2019.12.024. Epub 2020 Jan 25.
10
Pharmacologic prophylaxis for venous thromboembolism and 30-day outcomes among older patients hospitalized with heart failure: an analysis from the ADHERE national registry linked to Medicare claims.心力衰竭住院老年患者的静脉血栓栓塞症药物预防和 30 天结局:来自 ADHERE 国家登记处与医疗保险索赔链接的分析。
Clin Cardiol. 2011 Nov;34(11):682-8. doi: 10.1002/clc.20986. Epub 2011 Nov 6.

引用本文的文献

1
Venous thromboembolism events in trauma patients after hospital discharge.创伤患者出院后发生的静脉血栓栓塞事件。
J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2025 May 1;98(5):704-712. doi: 10.1097/TA.0000000000004527. Epub 2025 Feb 17.