From the Department of Anesthesiology, First Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, Suzhou, Jiangsu, China.
Institute of Anesthesiology, Soochow University, Suzhou, Jiangsu, China.
Anesth Analg. 2024 Jan 1;138(1):161-170. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0000000000006686. Epub 2023 Oct 24.
BACKGROUND: Postoperative delirium (POD) is common among older surgical patients and may be affected by dexmedetomidine and depth of anesthesia. We designed this pilot study to assess the feasibility of comparing dexmedetomidine with normal saline during light versus deep anesthesia on POD in older patients undergoing major noncardiac surgery. METHODS: In this pilot randomized factorial study, 80 patients aged 60 years or older undergoing major noncardiac surgery were randomized (1:1:1:1) to receive dexmedetomidine infusion 0.5 μg/kg/h or normal saline placebo during light (bispectral index [BIS] target 55) or deep (BIS target 40) anesthesia. Feasibility end points included consent rate and dropout rate, timely enrollment, blinded study drug administration throughout surgery, no inadvertent unmasking, achieving BIS target throughout >70% of surgery duration, and the process of twice-daily POD screening. In addition, we estimated the POD incidences in the 2 control groups (placebo and deep anesthesia) and treatment effects of dexmedetomidine and light anesthesia. RESULTS: Between November 1, 2021, and June 30, 2022, 78 patients completed the trial (mean [standard deviation, SD] age, 69.6 [4.6] years; 48 male patients [62%]; dexmedetomidine-deep, n = 19; dexmedetomidine-light, n = 20; placebo-deep, n = 19; placebo-light, n = 20). This study had a high consent rate (86%) and a low dropout rate (2.5%). Average recruitment was 5 patients at each center per month. Dexmedetomidine and normal saline were administered in a blinded fashion in all patients. Unmasking did not occur in either group. Approximately 99% of patients received the scheduled study drug infusion throughout the surgery. Approximately 81% of patients achieved the BIS targets throughout >70% of the surgery duration. The scheduled twice-daily POD screening was completed without exception. Overall, 10 of the 78 patients (13%; 95% confidence interval [CI], 7%-22%) developed POD. For the 2 reference groups, POD was observed in 7 of the 39 patients (17.9%; 95% CI, 9%-32.7%) in the placebo group and 7 of the 38 patients (18.4%; 95% CI, 9.2%-33.4%) in the deep anesthesia group. Regarding the treatment effects on POD, the estimated between-group difference was -10% (95% CI, -28% to 7%) for dexmedetomidine versus placebo, and -11% (95% CI, -28% to 6%) for light versus deep anesthesia. CONCLUSIONS: The findings of this pilot study demonstrate the feasibility of assessing dexmedetomidine versus placebo during light versus deep anesthesia on POD among older patients undergoing major noncardiac surgery, and justify a multicenter randomized factorial trial.
背景:术后谵妄(POD)在老年手术患者中较为常见,可能受到右美托咪定和麻醉深度的影响。我们设计了这项初步研究,旨在评估在接受非心脏大手术的老年患者中,比较右美托咪定与生理盐水在浅麻醉与深麻醉时对 POD 的影响的可行性。
方法:在这项初步随机析因研究中,80 名年龄在 60 岁及以上的接受非心脏大手术的患者被随机(1:1:1:1)分配至接受右美托咪定 0.5μg/kg/h 输注或生理盐水安慰剂,分别在浅麻醉(脑电双频指数[BIS]目标值 55)或深麻醉(BIS 目标值 40)下接受治疗。可行性终点包括同意率和退出率、及时入组、手术全程盲法给予研究药物、无意外揭盲、>70%手术时间达到 BIS 目标值、以及每日两次的 POD 筛查流程。此外,我们还估计了两个对照组(安慰剂和深麻醉)的 POD 发生率和右美托咪定及浅麻醉的治疗效果。
结果:2021 年 11 月 1 日至 2022 年 6 月 30 日,78 名患者完成了试验(平均[标准差,SD]年龄 69.6[4.6]岁;48 名男性患者[62%];右美托咪定-深麻醉组,n=19;右美托咪定-浅麻醉组,n=20;安慰剂-深麻醉组,n=19;安慰剂-浅麻醉组,n=20)。这项研究的同意率较高(86%),退出率较低(2.5%)。每个中心每月平均招募 5 名患者。所有患者均以盲法接受右美托咪定和生理盐水治疗。两组均未发生揭盲。约 99%的患者在整个手术过程中接受了计划的研究药物输注。约 81%的患者在>70%的手术时间内达到了 BIS 目标值。每日两次的 POD 筛查均按计划完成。总的来说,78 名患者中有 10 名(13%;95%置信区间[CI],7%-22%)发生了 POD。在两个参考组中,安慰剂组有 7 名(17.9%;95% CI,9%-32.7%)患者和深麻醉组有 7 名(18.4%;95% CI,9.2%-33.4%)患者发生了 POD。关于 POD 的治疗效果,右美托咪定与安慰剂相比,组间差异估计为-10%(95% CI,-28%至 7%),与深麻醉相比,组间差异估计为-11%(95% CI,-28%至 6%)。
结论:这项初步研究的结果表明,在接受非心脏大手术的老年患者中,评估右美托咪定与安慰剂在浅麻醉与深麻醉时对 POD 的影响是可行的,这为多中心随机析因试验提供了依据。
Drug Healthc Patient Saf. 2025-7-11