Suppr超能文献

依帕列净肽治疗2型糖尿病患者的安全性和有效性:一项随机对照试验的荟萃分析

Safety and Efficacy of Efpeglenatide in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.

作者信息

Escobar Johao, Monday Obinna, Vemoori Yashwanth, Yadav Indresh, Maslamani Abdalkareem Nael Jameel, Al Kutabi Salem, Saeed Leena, Khan Areeba

机构信息

Medicine, American College of Physicians, Philadelphia, USA.

Medicine, Norfolk and Norwich University Teaching Hospital, Norwich, GBR.

出版信息

Cureus. 2023 Sep 25;15(9):e45927. doi: 10.7759/cureus.45927. eCollection 2023 Sep.

Abstract

The aim of this study was to assess the efficacy and safety of efpeglenatide in patients with type 2 diabetes (T2D). The study was reported according to the 2020 guidelines of the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses (PRISMA) statement. Web of Science, PubMed, and Scopus databases were searched by two authors independently, with no restriction on language and year of publication, using the following key terms: (efpeglenatide) OR (glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonist) AND (type 2 diabetes) OR (diabetes) OR (T2DM) AND (HbA1c) OR (FSG) OR (fasting serum glucose) OR (weight) OR (bodyweight) OR (adverse events) OR (safety) OR (AE). Outcomes assessed in this meta-analysis included change in hemoglobin A1C (HbA1C) from baseline (%), change in weight from baseline (Kg), and change in fasting serum glucose (FSG) from baselines. For the safety analysis, we assessed total adverse events and gastrointestinal (GI) adverse events. A total of four studies fulfilled the inclusion and exclusion criteria and were included in this meta-analysis, encompassing six randomized controlled trials (RCTs). Compared with a control group, efpeglenatide lowered the HbA1c (mean difference (MD): -0.81, 95% confidence interval (CI): -1.01 to -0.60), body weight (MD: -1.15, 95% CI: -1.82 to -0.47), and FSG (MD: -0.98, 95% CI: -1.19 to -0.77). However, the risk of GI-related adverse events was significantly higher in the efpeglenatide group compared to the control group.

摘要

本研究的目的是评估依佩格列肽在2型糖尿病(T2D)患者中的疗效和安全性。该研究按照系统评价和Meta分析的首选报告项目(PRISMA)声明的2020年指南进行报告。两位作者独立检索了Web of Science、PubMed和Scopus数据库,对语言和出版年份无限制,使用以下关键词:(依佩格列肽)或(胰高血糖素样肽-1受体激动剂)与(2型糖尿病)或(糖尿病)或(T2DM)以及(糖化血红蛋白)或(空腹血糖)或(空腹血清葡萄糖)或(体重)或(体重)或(不良事件)或(安全性)或(AE)。本Meta分析评估的结局包括糖化血红蛋白(HbA1C)较基线的变化(%)、体重较基线的变化(kg)以及空腹血清葡萄糖(FSG)较基线的变化。对于安全性分析,我们评估了总不良事件和胃肠道(GI)不良事件。共有四项研究符合纳入和排除标准,并纳入本Meta分析,涵盖六项随机对照试验(RCT)。与对照组相比,依佩格列肽降低了HbA1c(平均差(MD):-0.81,95%置信区间(CI):-1.01至-0.60)、体重(MD:-1.15,95%CI:-1.82至-0.47)和FSG(MD:-0.98,95%CI:-1.19至-0.77)。然而,与对照组相比,依佩格列肽组胃肠道相关不良事件的风险显著更高。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9d2b/10599090/d2b2bbd5b062/cureus-0015-00000045927-i01.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验