Department of Orthopedics, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Anhui Medical University, Hefei, China.
Medicine (Baltimore). 2023 Oct 27;102(43):e35803. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000035803.
Medical education has evolved rapidly, with the development of flipped classrooms and team-based learning based on lecture-based learning, but the novel model of combining flipped classrooms with team-based learning has been poorly investigated in orthopedic education.
A femoral neck fracture teaching mode was chosen to 109 clinical internship students to explore the effectiveness of flipped classroom combined with team-based learning in internship education. They were enrolled and randomly divided into either the flipped classroom combined with team-based learning group (FTG, n = 55) or the traditional lecture-based classroom group (n = 54). All students completed the learning according to the course flow and took before-class and after-class tests. The questionnaires were used to compare students perceptions and satisfaction with the different teaching methods and were utilized to assess the strengths and weaknesses of the 2 groups.
The post-class test scores of both groups significantly improved compared to pre-class test scores. Regarding the post-class test scores, FTG's was significantly higher than the traditional lecture-based classroom group's, mainly in clinical areas such as imaging analysis, fracture classification, treatment options, and management of postoperative complications, but there was no significant difference in the mastery of basic theoretical knowledge. The students were more satisfied with the FTG and believed that it improved their various competencies, but with significantly more time spent.
FTG is generally recognized as a promising option for training clinical interns and is worth spreading as it has outstanding merits in developing students clinical competence.
医学教育发展迅速,翻转课堂和基于讲座的团队学习已经取代了传统的教学模式,但在骨科教育中,结合翻转课堂和团队学习的新型模式仍鲜有研究。
选择股骨颈骨折教学模式对 109 名临床实习学生进行研究,以探索翻转课堂结合团队学习在实习教育中的有效性。他们被纳入并随机分为翻转课堂结合团队学习组(FTG,n=55)或传统讲座课堂组(n=54)。所有学生都按照课程流程完成学习,并进行课前和课后测试。问卷调查用于比较学生对不同教学方法的看法和满意度,并评估两组的优缺点。
与课前测试相比,两组的课后测试分数均显著提高。就课后测试分数而言,FTG 组明显高于传统讲座课堂组,主要在影像学分析、骨折分类、治疗选择和术后并发症管理等临床领域,但在基本理论知识的掌握方面没有显著差异。学生对 FTG 更满意,并认为它提高了他们的各种能力,但花费的时间明显更多。
FTG 被普遍认为是培训临床实习生的一种有前途的选择,值得推广,因为它在培养学生的临床能力方面具有突出的优点。