Anaesthesia. 2023 Dec;78(12):1453-1464. doi: 10.1111/anae.16154. Epub 2023 Nov 3.
The Royal College of Anaesthetists' 7th National Audit Project baseline survey assessed knowledge, attitudes, practices and experiences of peri-operative cardiac arrests among UK anaesthetists and Anaesthesia Associates. We received 10,746 responses, representing a 71% response rate. In-date training in adult and paediatric advanced life support was reported by 9646 (90%) and 7125 (66%) anaesthetists, respectively. There were 8994 (84%) respondents who were confident in leading a peri-operative cardiac arrest, with males more confident than females, but only 5985 (56%) were confident in leading a debrief and 7340 (68%) communicating with next of kin. In the previous two years, 4806 (46%) respondents had managed at least one peri-operative cardiac arrest, of which 321 (7%) and 189 (4%) of these events involved a child or an obstetric patient, respectively. Respondents estimated the most common causes of peri-operative cardiac arrest to be hypovolaemia, hypoxaemia and cardiac ischaemia, with haemorrhage coming fifth. However, the most common reported causes for the most recently attended peri-operative cardiac arrest were haemorrhage; (927, 20%); anaphylaxis (474, 10%); and cardiac ischaemia (397, 9%). Operating lists or shifts were paused or stopped after 1330 (39%) cardiac arrests and 1693 (38%) respondents attended a debrief, with 'hot' debriefs most common. Informal wellbeing support was relatively common (2458, 56%) and formal support was uncommon (472, 11%). An impact on future care delivery was reported by 196 (4%) anaesthetists, most commonly a negative psychological impact. Management of a peri-operative cardiac arrest during their career was reported by 8654 (85%) respondents. The overall impact on professional life was more often judged positive (2630, 30%) than negative (1961, 23%), but impact on personal life was more often negative.
英国皇家麻醉师学院第 7 次国家审计项目基线调查评估了英国麻醉师和麻醉助理在围手术期心脏骤停方面的知识、态度、实践和经验。我们收到了 10746 份回复,回复率为 71%。分别有 9646 名(90%)和 7125 名(66%)麻醉师报告接受过成人和儿科高级生命支持的最新培训。有 8994 名(84%)受访者有信心领导围手术期心脏骤停,男性比女性更有信心,但只有 5985 名(56%)有信心领导事后讨论,7340 名(68%)有信心与家属沟通。在过去两年中,4806 名(46%)受访者至少管理过一次围手术期心脏骤停,其中 321 名(7%)和 189 名(4%)的心脏骤停事件涉及儿童或产科患者。受访者估计围手术期心脏骤停最常见的原因是低血容量、低氧血症和心肌缺血,出血排在第五位。然而,最近一次参加的围手术期心脏骤停最常见的报告原因是出血(927 例,20%);过敏反应(474 例,10%)和心肌缺血(397 例,9%)。1330 例(39%)心脏骤停后,手术清单或班次暂停或停止,1693 名(38%)受访者参加了事后讨论,最常见的是“热点”事后讨论。相对常见的是非正式的幸福感支持(2458 例,56%),而正式支持则较少见(472 例,11%)。196 名(4%)麻醉师报告对未来护理服务的实施产生了影响,最常见的是产生了负面的心理影响。8654 名(85%)受访者报告在其职业生涯中管理过围手术期心脏骤停。对专业生活的总体影响更多地被判断为积极(2630 例,30%)而不是消极(1961 例,23%),但对个人生活的影响更多地是消极的。