Suppr超能文献

生物类似药与参比药品的临床相似性:全面综述及新前沿公共卫生的新希望

Clinical Similarity of Biosimilars and Reference Drugs: A Comprehensive Review and New Hope for Public Health in a New Frontier.

作者信息

Adatiya Mansi D, Devani Aanal A, Dudhia Vishal N, Chorawala Mehul R, Patel Vishvas N, Patel Manish P

机构信息

Department of Pharmacology, L. M. College of Pharmacy, Opp. Gujarat University, Ahmedabad, 380009, Gujarat, India.

Department of pharmaceutics and pharmaceutical technology, L. M. College of Pharmacy, Opp. Gujarat University, Navrangpura, Ahmedabad-380 009, Gujarat, India.

出版信息

Curr Drug Res Rev. 2025;17(1):41-58. doi: 10.2174/0125899775246113231018080526.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Patents and exclusive rights on reference biologics contribute to the emergence of biosimilars. Regulatory bodies, such as the Food and Drug Administration (FDA), World Health Organization (WHO), and EMA (European Medicines Agency) for assessing clinical safety, effectiveness, and consequences between biosimilars and reference medications, have established guidelines. Since generic small molecules from reference can be easily swapped, biosimilars cannot be used interchangeably and may not always indicate interchangeability due to highly restrictive properties. It can be replaced with a reference without the healthcare provider's help under the interchangeability context.

OBJECTIVES

The purpose of our study is to analyze and compare evidence-based clinical safety, therapeutic potential, and importance (outcomes) of several biosimilars with their references along with clinical uses in chronic diseases.

METHODS

Through a comprehensive systemic literature review of more than 100 articles involving medicinally important drugs whose bio-similarity works optimally, safety-efficacy parameters have been analyzed. Analysis of biosimilar usage, approval, and safety-efficacy aspects are majorly focused upon herein in this review.

RESULTS

From this systemic review, it can be stated that the majority of biosimilars are clinically and statistically equivalent to their originators. As biosimilars have good safety-efficacy aspects with lower prices, their utilization can be more encouraged, which was already done by the FDA with the establishment of a public online database entitled "Purple Book," which includes all information regarding biological drugs.

CONCLUSION

To conclude, we suggest wide spread use of high-grade biosimilars in clinical practice, may be via changing, exchanging, or switching, with appropriate clinical monitoring and pharmacovigilance to improve patient accessibility to modern medicines, as it provides similar efficacy and safety parameters across all the accumulated clinical trials and studies.

摘要

背景

参照生物制品的专利和专有权促使了生物类似药的出现。监管机构,如美国食品药品监督管理局(FDA)、世界卫生组织(WHO)和欧洲药品管理局(EMA),已制定了用于评估生物类似药与参照药物之间临床安全性、有效性及影响的指南。由于参照药物的通用小分子可以轻易替换,而生物类似药因具有高度限制性特性,不能互换使用,且不一定总是表明具有可互换性。在可互换性的情况下,无需医疗服务提供者的帮助即可用参照药物替代生物类似药。

目的

我们研究的目的是分析和比较几种生物类似药与其参照药物在基于证据的临床安全性、治疗潜力及重要性(结果)方面的情况,以及它们在慢性病中的临床应用。

方法

通过对100多篇涉及生物相似性最佳的重要药用药物的文章进行全面系统的文献综述,分析了安全性-有效性参数。本综述主要聚焦于生物类似药的使用、批准及安全性-有效性方面的分析。

结果

从这一系统综述可以看出,大多数生物类似药在临床和统计学上与其原研药等效。由于生物类似药具有良好的安全性-有效性且价格较低,因此可以更鼓励其使用,美国食品药品监督管理局已经通过建立一个名为“紫皮书”的公共在线数据库做到了这一点,该数据库包含有关生物药物的所有信息。

结论

总之,我们建议在临床实践中广泛使用高质量的生物类似药,或许可以通过更换、交换或转换,并进行适当的临床监测和药物警戒,以提高患者获得现代药物的可及性,因为在所有累积的临床试验和研究中,生物类似药都提供了相似的疗效和安全性参数。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验