Department of Surgical Oncology, Isala Zwolle, Dokter Van Heesweg 2, 8025 AB, Zwolle, the Netherlands.
Department of Pathology, Isala Zwolle, Zwolle, the Netherlands.
Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2024 Feb;203(3):477-486. doi: 10.1007/s10549-023-07122-8. Epub 2023 Nov 4.
In the treatment of breast cancer, neo-adjuvant chemotherapy is often used as systemic treatment followed by tumor excision. In this context, planning the operation with regard to excision margins relies on tumor size measured by MRI. The actual tumor size can be determined through pathologic evaluation. The aim of this study is to investigate the correlation and agreement between pre-operative MRI and postoperative pathological evaluation.
One hundred and ninety-three breast cancer patients that underwent neo-adjuvant chemotherapy and subsequent breast surgery were retrospectively included between January 2013 and July 2016. Preoperative tumor diameters determined with MRI were compared with postoperative tumor diameters determined by pathological analysis. Spearman correlation and Bland-Altman agreement methods were used. Results were subjected to subgroup analysis based on histological subtype (ER, HER2, ductal, lobular).
The correlation between tumor size at MRI and pathology was 0.63 for the whole group, 0.39 for subtype ER + /HER2-, 0.51 for ER + /HER2 + , 0.63 for ER-/HER2 +, and 0.85 for ER-/HER2-. The mean difference and limits of agreement (LoA) between tumor size measured MRI vs. pathological assessment was 4.6 mm (LoA -27.0-36.3 mm, n = 195). Mean differences and LoA for subtype ER + /HER2- was 7.6 mm (LoA -31.3-46.5 mm, n = 100), for ER + /HER2 + 0.9 mm (LoA -8.5-10.2 mm, n = 33), for ER-/HER2+ -1.2 mm (LoA -5.1-7.5 mm, n = 21), and for ER-/HER- -0.4 mm (LoA -8.6-7.7 mm, n = 41).
HER2 + and ER-/HER2- tumor subtypes showed clear correlation and agreement between preoperative MRI and postoperative pathological assessment of tumor size. This suggests that MRI evaluation could be a suitable predictor to guide the surgical approach. Conversely, correlation and agreement for ER + /HER2- and lobular tumors was poor, evidenced by a difference in tumor size of up to 5 cm. Hence, we demonstrate that histological tumor subtype should be taken into account when planning breast conserving surgery after NAC.
在乳腺癌的治疗中,新辅助化疗常作为全身治疗,随后进行肿瘤切除术。在这种情况下,切除边缘的手术规划依赖于 MRI 测量的肿瘤大小。肿瘤的实际大小可以通过病理评估来确定。本研究旨在探讨术前 MRI 与术后病理评估之间的相关性和一致性。
回顾性纳入 2013 年 1 月至 2016 年 7 月期间接受新辅助化疗和随后的乳房手术的 193 例乳腺癌患者。比较 MRI 确定的术前肿瘤直径与病理分析确定的术后肿瘤直径。采用 Spearman 相关和 Bland-Altman 一致性方法。结果根据组织学亚型(ER、HER2、导管、小叶)进行亚组分析。
全组肿瘤大小在 MRI 与病理学之间的相关性为 0.63,ER+/HER2-亚型为 0.39,ER+/HER2+亚型为 0.51,ER-/HER2+亚型为 0.63,ER-/HER2-亚型为 0.85。MRI 测量的肿瘤大小与病理评估之间的平均差异和一致性界限(LoA)为 4.6mm(LoA-27.0-36.3mm,n=195)。ER+/HER2-亚型的平均差异和 LoA 为 7.6mm(LoA-31.3-46.5mm,n=100),ER+/HER2+亚型为 0.9mm(LoA-8.5-10.2mm,n=33),ER-/HER2+亚型为-1.2mm(LoA-5.1-7.5mm,n=21),ER-/HER-亚型为-0.4mm(LoA-8.6-7.7mm,n=41)。
HER2+和 ER-/HER2-肿瘤亚型在术前 MRI 和术后病理评估肿瘤大小时显示出明显的相关性和一致性。这表明 MRI 评估可能是指导手术方法的合适预测指标。相反,ER+/HER2-和小叶肿瘤的相关性和一致性较差,肿瘤大小差异最大可达 5cm。因此,我们证明在新辅助化疗后行保乳手术时应考虑组织学肿瘤亚型。