Steenhuis Dennis, Li Xuechun, Feenstra Talitha, Hak Eelko, de Vos Stijn
Unit of PharmacoTherapy, Epidemiology and Economics, Groningen Research Institute of Pharmacy, University of Groningen, A. Deusinglaan 1, 9713 AV, Groningen, The Netherlands.
Drugs Real World Outcomes. 2024 Mar;11(1):99-108. doi: 10.1007/s40801-023-00397-9. Epub 2023 Nov 4.
Drug non-adherence in primary preventive cardiovascular therapy is one of the most important modifiable drivers of cardiovascular events. The effect of deductibles in healthcare cost-sharing plans (the amount that has to be paid for healthcare services before the insurance company starts to pay) on such non-adherence in a European setting is unknown. Therefore, we estimated the association between deductibles and the adherence to primary preventive antihypertensive and antihyperlipidemic medication.
Using the claims database of Menzis Health Insurer in the Netherlands, we applied ordered beta regression mixed modelling to estimate the association between deductibles and adherence taking several demographic and social-economic factors, repeated measurements and within-patient variation into account.
All in all, 106,316 patients starting primary preventive antihypertensive or antihyperlipidemic monotherapy were eligible for analysis. At index date, mean age of the study population was 58 years and 52% were male. Reaching the deductible limit and no need to pay for medication anymore increased the adherence [relative adherence ratio (RAR) 1.03, 95% confidence interval (95% CI): 1.00-1.05] for antihyperlipidemic therapy and 1.02 (95% CI: 1.00-1.04) for antihypertensive therapy. A larger deductible amount decreases the adherence of antihyperlipidemic and antihypertensive therapy (RAR 0.83; 95% CI: 0.69-1.00 and RAR 0.85, 95% CI: 0.74-0.98, respectively).
Independent of other risk factors for non-adherence, presence of deductibles in health insurance is associated with a small negative effect on the adherence to both primary preventive antihypertensive as well as antihyperlipidemic therapy. Further study is needed on the potential health-economic consequences.
在心血管疾病一级预防治疗中,药物治疗依从性不佳是导致心血管事件的最重要且可改变的因素之一。在欧洲背景下,医保费用分担计划中的免赔额(即保险公司开始支付之前必须自行承担的医疗服务费用金额)对这种治疗依从性不佳的影响尚不清楚。因此,我们估计了免赔额与一级预防抗高血压和抗高血脂药物治疗依从性之间的关联。
我们利用荷兰门齐斯健康保险公司的理赔数据库,应用有序贝塔回归混合模型,在考虑了多个人口统计学和社会经济因素、重复测量以及患者个体差异的情况下,估计免赔额与治疗依从性之间的关联。
总体而言,106316名开始接受一级预防抗高血压或抗高血脂单药治疗的患者符合分析条件。在索引日期,研究人群的平均年龄为58岁,男性占52%。达到免赔额上限且无需再支付药费会提高抗高血脂治疗的依从性[相对依从率(RAR)为1.03,95%置信区间(95%CI):1.00 - 1.05],抗高血压治疗的依从性相对依从率为1.02(95%CI:1.00 - 1.04)。免赔额越高,抗高血脂和抗高血压治疗的依从性越低(相对依从率分别为0.83;95%CI:0.69 - 1.00和相对依从率0.85,95%CI:0.74 - 0.98)。
独立于其他导致治疗依从性不佳的风险因素,医疗保险中的免赔额对一级预防抗高血压和抗高血脂治疗的依从性有轻微负面影响。需要进一步研究其潜在的健康经济后果。