Department of Women's Health, Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.
Faculty of Life Sciences & Medicine at Guy's, School of Life Course Sciences, King's College London, London, UK.
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2024 Jan;63(1):105-112. doi: 10.1002/uog.27529.
Around 80% of women with endometriosis have superficial endometriosis (SE) rather than ovarian or deep endometriosis (DE). However, to date, advances in non-invasive, imaging-based diagnosis have been limited to DE or ovarian disease. The objective of this study was to determine whether we can detect SE on transvaginal ultrasound scan (TVS) by assessing the peritoneum of the pouch of Douglas (POD).
This was a retrospective diagnostic test study following a change in practice to include POD peritoneum assessment for SE during TVS at a tertiary London hospital. Eligible patients underwent TVS by a single clinician trained in endometriosis scanning and a subsequent surgical procedure (laparoscopy) between April 2018 and September 2021. Participants formed a consecutive series. The TVS findings were compared with those of laparoscopy as the gold standard. Comparison of TVS findings with intraoperative findings was performed by calculating the diagnostic test performance measures (sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV) and positive and negative likelihood ratios).
The study included a total of 100 patients. We found that 43/100 (43.0%) patients had no endometriosis, 33/100 (33.0%) had SE and 24/100 (24.0%) had DE on laparoscopy. SE was correctly detected on TVS in 17/33 patients, with a sensitivity of 51.5% (95% CI, 33.5-69.2%), specificity of 94.0% (95% CI, 85.4-98.4%), PPV of 81.0% (95% CI, 60.8-92.1%) and NPV of 79.7% (95% CI, 73.4-84.9%). DE was correctly diagnosed in 20/24 cases, including all ovarian cases, with a sensitivity of 83.3% (95% CI, 62.3-95.3%), specificity of 97.4% (95% CI, 90.8-99.7%), PPV of 90.9% (95% CI, 71.6-97.5%) and NPV of 94.9% (95% CI, 88.3-97.8%). The detection of SE on TVS was most accurate in the POD (sensitivity, 50.0%; specificity, 96.4%; PPV, 76.9%; NPV, 88.9%).
This study shows that the detection of SE in the POD is possible using routine TVS. While negative TVS does not reliably confirm the absence of disease or replace diagnostic laparoscopy, positive TVS facilitates non-invasive diagnosis for a much larger group of women than was previously possible. This should help to reduce the time from the onset of symptoms to diagnosis and enable initiation of medical treatment without the risk, cost and delay associated with a surgical diagnosis. © 2023 The Authors. Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology.
大约 80%的子宫内膜异位症患者为表浅型子宫内膜异位症(SE),而非卵巢型或深部子宫内膜异位症(DE)。然而,迄今为止,非侵入性、基于影像学的诊断进展仅限于 DE 或卵巢疾病。本研究旨在确定我们是否可以通过评估Douglas 窝腹膜(POD)来在经阴道超声扫描(TVS)上检测到 SE。
这是一项回顾性诊断性试验研究,在伦敦一家三级医院,将 SE 的 POD 腹膜评估纳入 TVS 检查,改变了实践方案。符合条件的患者在 2018 年 4 月至 2021 年 9 月期间由一位接受过子宫内膜异位症扫描培训的临床医生进行 TVS 检查,随后进行腹腔镜手术。参与者构成连续系列。将 TVS 结果与腹腔镜检查结果作为金标准进行比较。通过计算诊断测试性能指标(敏感性、特异性、阳性预测值(PPV)、阴性预测值(NPV)以及阳性和阴性似然比)来比较 TVS 结果与术中结果。
该研究共纳入了 100 例患者。我们发现,100 例患者中有 43 例(43.0%)无子宫内膜异位症,33 例(33.0%)为 SE,24 例(24.0%)为 DE。腹腔镜检查正确检测到 SE 为 17/33 例,敏感性为 51.5%(95%CI,33.5%-69.2%),特异性为 94.0%(95%CI,85.4%-98.4%),阳性预测值为 81.0%(95%CI,60.8%-92.1%),阴性预测值为 79.7%(95%CI,73.4%-84.9%)。DE 在 20/24 例中得到正确诊断,包括所有卵巢病例,敏感性为 83.3%(95%CI,62.3%-95.3%),特异性为 97.4%(95%CI,90.8%-99.7%),阳性预测值为 90.9%(95%CI,71.6%-97.5%),阴性预测值为 94.9%(95%CI,88.3%-97.8%)。在 TVS 上检测 SE 最准确的是 POD(敏感性为 50.0%;特异性为 96.4%;PPV 为 76.9%;NPV 为 88.9%)。
本研究表明,使用常规 TVS 可以在 POD 中检测到 SE。虽然阴性 TVS 不能可靠地确认疾病的不存在或替代诊断性腹腔镜检查,但阳性 TVS 使比以前更大的一组女性能够进行非侵入性诊断。这应该有助于减少从症状出现到诊断的时间,并能够在不进行与手术诊断相关的风险、成本和延迟的情况下开始药物治疗。2023 年,作者。《妇产科超声》由 John Wiley & Sons Ltd 与国际妇产科超声学会联合出版。