Moon Daseul, Kim Hyunjoo
Center for Labour and Health Research, People's Health Institute, Seoul, Korea.
Serious Accidents Scholars and Experts Network, Seoul, Korea.
Ann Occup Environ Med. 2023 Jul 20;35:e20. doi: 10.35371/aoem.2023.35.e20. eCollection 2023.
The policy proposal by the current Korean government that proposes flexible overtime rules is causing social controversy. This study has explored the 612 experts' opinions on the occupational safety and health impacts of the policy using an online self-report survey. They expected short-term overwork (87.25%), overwork inequality (86.44%), irregular working hours (84.31%), chronic overwork (84.15%), long working hours (83.66%), and unpredictability of working hours (81.86%) as a result of the policy change. They also responded that the policy change would increase industrial accident deaths (87.25%), mental illnesses (87.09%), deaths due to overwork or cardiovascular diseases (83.84%), and accidents (83.33%). They disagreed that the government's flexibilization policy, while agreeing that the necessity of policies on regulating night work (94.77%), guaranteeing wages to eliminate overtime (90.36%), establishing working time regulations for the bogus self-employed (82.84%), and applying the 52-hour workweek system to all workplaces (76.47%). These expert opinions are consistent with previous research on the health effects of working hours.
韩国现任政府提出的关于灵活加班规定的政策提案引发了社会争议。本研究通过在线自我报告调查,探讨了612位专家对该政策职业安全与健康影响的看法。他们预计政策变化会导致短期过度劳累(87.25%)、过度劳累不平等(86.44%)、工作时间不规律(84.31%)、长期过度劳累(84.15%)、工作时间长(83.66%)以及工作时间不可预测(81.86%)。他们还回应称,政策变化会增加工业事故死亡人数(87.25%)、精神疾病(87.09%)、因过度劳累或心血管疾病导致的死亡(83.84%)以及事故(83.33%)。他们不同意政府的灵活化政策,同时认同规范夜班工作政策的必要性(94.77%)、保证工资以消除加班的必要性(90.36%)、为虚假个体经营者制定工作时间规定的必要性(82.84%)以及在所有工作场所实行每周52小时工作制的必要性(76.47%)。这些专家意见与先前关于工作时间对健康影响的研究一致。