Suppr超能文献

[新生儿中性粒细胞减少对脓毒症存在情况有何提示?临床实验室检查的预测价值]

[What does neutropenia tell about the existence of sepsis in the newborn? Predictive value of clinical laboratory tests].

作者信息

Kind C

出版信息

Helv Paediatr Acta. 1986 Oct;41(4):277-89.

PMID:3793507
Abstract

A laboratory test can have one of three different functions. As a confirmatory test it can prove a diagnosis, as a screening test it can indicate the probability, that a disease in question is actually present, and as a monitoring test it can be used to guide a medical therapy. To assess the clinical value of a screening test the criteria of sensitivity, specificity and predictive value are commonly used. The meaning of these terms is explained using the example of neutropenia as a screening test for sepsis on the first day of life. For the neonates admitted during their first day of life to the neonatology units of the obstetric and paediatric departments of Zurich University a neutrophil count below 3 X 10(9)/1 as a test for sepsis has a sensitivity of 67%, a specificity of 96.7%, a predictive value of the positive test of 20%, and a predictive value of the negative test of 99.6%. The predictive value of a test is strongly dependent on the prevalence of the disease looked for in the population under study. Variation of the cut off point of a screening test results in a change of its sensitivity and predictive value of the positive test in the opposite direction.

摘要

实验室检测可以有三种不同的功能。作为确诊检测,它可以证实诊断;作为筛查检测,它可以表明所讨论的疾病实际存在的可能性;作为监测检测,它可以用于指导医学治疗。为了评估筛查检测的临床价值,通常使用敏感性、特异性和预测值等标准。以出生第一天的中性粒细胞减少作为脓毒症筛查检测为例来解释这些术语的含义。对于出生第一天入住苏黎世大学妇产科和儿科新生儿科的新生儿,以中性粒细胞计数低于3×10⁹/L作为脓毒症检测,其敏感性为67%,特异性为96.7%,阳性检测的预测值为20%,阴性检测的预测值为99.6%。检测的预测值很大程度上取决于所研究人群中所寻找疾病的患病率。筛查检测截断点的变化会导致其敏感性和阳性检测预测值呈相反方向变化。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验