Suppr超能文献

显性遗传与散发性早发型阿尔茨海默病的纵向临床、认知和生物标志物特征

Longitudinal clinical, cognitive and biomarker profiles in dominantly inherited versus sporadic early-onset Alzheimer's disease.

作者信息

Llibre-Guerra Jorge J, Iaccarino Leonardo, Coble Dean, Edwards Lauren, Li Yan, McDade Eric, Strom Amelia, Gordon Brian, Mundada Nidhi, Schindler Suzanne E, Tsoy Elena, Ma Yinjiao, Lu Ruijin, Fagan Anne M, Benzinger Tammie L S, Soleimani-Meigooni David, Aschenbrenner Andrew J, Miller Zachary, Wang Guoqiao, Kramer Joel H, Hassenstab Jason, Rosen Howard J, Morris John C, Miller Bruce L, Xiong Chengjie, Perrin Richard J, Allegri Ricardo, Chrem Patricio, Surace Ezequiel, Berman Sarah B, Chhatwal Jasmeer, Masters Colin L, Farlow Martin R, Jucker Mathias, Levin Johannes, Fox Nick C, Day Gregory, Gorno-Tempini Maria Luisa, Boxer Adam L, La Joie Renaud, Rabinovici Gil D, Bateman Randall

机构信息

Department of Neurology, Washington University in St Louis, St Louis, MO 63108, USA.

Department of Neurology, UCSF Weill Institute for Neurosciences, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA 94158, USA.

出版信息

Brain Commun. 2023 Oct 18;5(6):fcad280. doi: 10.1093/braincomms/fcad280. eCollection 2023.

Abstract

Approximately 5% of Alzheimer's disease cases have an early age at onset (<65 years), with 5-10% of these cases attributed to dominantly inherited mutations and the remainder considered as sporadic. The extent to which dominantly inherited and sporadic early-onset Alzheimer's disease overlap is unknown. In this study, we explored the clinical, cognitive and biomarker profiles of early-onset Alzheimer's disease, focusing on commonalities and distinctions between dominantly inherited and sporadic cases. Our analysis included 117 participants with dominantly inherited Alzheimer's disease enrolled in the Dominantly Inherited Alzheimer Network and 118 individuals with sporadic early-onset Alzheimer's disease enrolled at the University of California San Francisco Alzheimer's Disease Research Center. Baseline differences in clinical and biomarker profiles between both groups were compared using -tests. Differences in the rates of decline were compared using linear mixed-effects models. Individuals with dominantly inherited Alzheimer's disease exhibited an earlier age-at-symptom onset compared with the sporadic group [43.4 (SD ± 8.5) years versus 54.8 (SD ± 5.0) years, respectively, < 0.001]. Sporadic cases showed a higher frequency of atypical clinical presentations relative to dominantly inherited (56.8% versus 8.5%, respectively) and a higher frequency of APOE-ε4 (50.0% versus 28.2%, = 0.001). Compared with sporadic early onset, motor manifestations were higher in the dominantly inherited cohort [32.5% versus 16.9% at baseline ( = 0.006) and 46.1% versus 25.4% at last visit ( = 0.001)]. At baseline, the sporadic early-onset group performed worse on category fluency ( < 0.001), Trail Making Test Part B ( < 0.001) and digit span ( < 0.001). Longitudinally, both groups demonstrated similar rates of cognitive and functional decline in the early stages. After 10 years from symptom onset, dominantly inherited participants experienced a greater decline as measured by Clinical Dementia Rating Sum of Boxes [3.63 versus 1.82 points ( = 0.035)]. CSF amyloid beta-42 levels were comparable [244 (SD ± 39.3) pg/ml dominantly inherited versus 296 (SD ± 24.8) pg/ml sporadic early onset, = 0.06]. CSF phosphorylated tau at threonine 181 levels were higher in the dominantly inherited Alzheimer's disease cohort (87.3 versus 59.7 pg/ml, = 0.005), but no significant differences were found for t-tau levels ( = 0.35). In summary, sporadic and inherited Alzheimer's disease differed in baseline profiles; sporadic early onset is best distinguished from dominantly inherited by later age at onset, high frequency of atypical clinical presentations and worse executive performance at baseline. Despite these differences, shared pathways in longitudinal clinical decline and CSF biomarkers suggest potential common therapeutic targets for both populations, offering valuable insights for future research and clinical trial design.

摘要

约5%的阿尔茨海默病病例发病年龄较早(<65岁),其中5-10%的病例归因于显性遗传突变,其余病例被认为是散发性的。显性遗传和散发性早发型阿尔茨海默病的重叠程度尚不清楚。在本研究中,我们探讨了早发型阿尔茨海默病的临床、认知和生物标志物特征,重点关注显性遗传和散发性病例之间的共性和差异。我们的分析包括117名参与显性遗传阿尔茨海默病网络的显性遗传阿尔茨海默病患者和118名在加利福尼亚大学旧金山分校阿尔茨海默病研究中心登记的散发性早发型阿尔茨海默病患者。使用t检验比较两组之间临床和生物标志物特征的基线差异。使用线性混合效应模型比较下降率的差异。与散发性组相比,显性遗传阿尔茨海默病患者出现症状的年龄更早[分别为43.4(标准差±8.5)岁和54.8(标准差±5.0)岁,P<0.001]。散发性病例相对于显性遗传病例表现出更高频率的非典型临床表现(分别为56.8%和8.5%)以及更高频率的APOE-ε4(50.0%和28.2%,P = 0.001)。与散发性早发型相比,显性遗传队列中的运动表现更高[基线时为32.5%对16.9%(P = 0.006),末次随访时为46.1%对25.4%(P = 0.001)]。在基线时,散发性早发型组在类别流畅性(P<0.001)、连线测验B部分(P<0.001)和数字广度(P<0.001)方面表现更差。纵向来看,两组在早期阶段的认知和功能下降率相似。症状出现10年后,根据临床痴呆评定量表盒式总和评估,显性遗传参与者的下降幅度更大[3.63分对1.82分(P = 0.035)]。脑脊液淀粉样蛋白β-42水平相当[显性遗传组为244(标准差±39.3)pg/ml,散发性早发型组为296(标准差±24.8)pg/ml,P = 0.06]。显性遗传阿尔茨海默病队列中脑脊液苏氨酸181位点磷酸化tau水平较高(87.3对59.7 pg/ml,P = 0.005),但总tau水平无显著差异(P = 0.35)。总之,散发性和遗传性阿尔茨海默病在基线特征上存在差异;散发性早发型与显性遗传的最佳区别在于发病年龄较晚、非典型临床表现频率高以及基线时执行功能表现较差。尽管存在这些差异,但纵向临床下降和脑脊液生物标志物中的共同途径提示这两种人群可能有潜在的共同治疗靶点,为未来的研究和临床试验设计提供了有价值的见解。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/44cc/10629466/a782a8f9096d/fcad280_ga1.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验