Department of Psychology, Norwegian University of Science and Technology (NTNU), Dragvoll, 7491, Trondheim, Norway; St Olav University Hospital, 7030, Trondheim, Norway.
Department of Psychology, Norwegian University of Science and Technology (NTNU), Dragvoll, 7491, Trondheim, Norway; St Olav University Hospital, 7030, Trondheim, Norway.
Appetite. 2024 Jan 1;192:107116. doi: 10.1016/j.appet.2023.107116. Epub 2023 Nov 10.
Eating behaviors are related to health and well-being. To examine stability and change in eating behaviors throughout life, developmentally appropriate measures capturing the same eating behavior dimensions are needed. The newly developed Adult Eating Behavior Questionnaire (AEBQ) builds on the well-established parent-reported Children's Eating Behavior Questionnaire (CEBQ), and together with the corresponding Baby Eating Behavior Questionnaire (BEBQ), these questionnaires cover all ages. However, validation studies on adolescents are relatively sparse and have yielded somewhat conflicting results. The present study adds to existing research by testing the psychometric properties of the AEBQ in a sample of 14-year-olds and examining its construct validity by means of the parent-reported CEBQ. The current study uses age 14 data (analysis sample: n = 636) from the ongoing Trondheim Early Secure Study, a longitudinal study of a representative birth cohort of Norwegian children (baseline: n = 1007). Confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) was conducted to test the factorial validity of AEBQ. Construct validity was examined by bivariate correlations between AEBQ subscales and CEBQ subscales. CFAs revealed that a 7-factor solution of the AEBQ, with the Hunger scale removed, was a better-fitting model than the original 8-factor structure. The 7-factor model was respecified based on theory and model fit indices, resulting in overall adequate model fit (χ = 896.86; CFI = 0.924; TLI = 0.912; RMSEA = 0.05 (90% CI: 0.043, 0.051); SRMR = 0.06). Furthermore, small-to-moderate correlations were found between corresponding AEBQ and CEBQ scales. This study supports a 7-factor solution of the AEBQ without the Hunger scale and provide evidence of its construct validity in adolescents. Several of the CEBQ subscales were significantly associated with weight status, whereas this was the case for only one of the AEBQ scales.
饮食习惯与健康和幸福有关。为了研究一生中饮食习惯的稳定性和变化,需要使用能够捕捉相同饮食习惯维度的、适合发展阶段的测量工具。新开发的成人饮食行为问卷(AEBQ)建立在成熟的父母报告儿童饮食行为问卷(CEBQ)的基础上,加上相应的婴儿饮食行为问卷(BEBQ),这些问卷涵盖了所有年龄段。然而,关于青少年的验证研究相对较少,并且得出了一些相互矛盾的结果。本研究通过在 14 岁的样本中测试 AEBQ 的心理测量特性,并通过父母报告的 CEBQ 来检验其结构有效性,从而为现有研究做出了贡献。本研究使用了正在进行的特隆赫姆早期安全研究(一项对挪威儿童代表性出生队列的纵向研究)中 14 岁的数据(分析样本:n=636),基线数据为 1007 名儿童。进行验证性因素分析(CFA)以测试 AEBQ 的因子有效性。通过 AEBQ 分量表和 CEBQ 分量表之间的双变量相关性来检验结构有效性。CFA 显示,去除饥饿量表后,AEBQ 的 7 因素解决方案是比原始 8 因素结构更适合的模型。根据理论和模型拟合指数,重新指定了 7 因素模型,结果总体上具有适当的模型拟合(χ=896.86;CFI=0.924;TLI=0.912;RMSEA=0.05(90%CI:0.043,0.051);SRMR=0.06)。此外,还发现相应的 AEBQ 和 CEBQ 量表之间存在小到中等大小的相关性。本研究支持 AEBQ 去除饥饿量表的 7 因素解决方案,并提供了其在青少年中的结构有效性的证据。CEBQ 的几个分量表与体重状况显著相关,而 AEBQ 的分量表只有一个与体重状况相关。