Costa Hugo, Vinhas Hugo, Calé Rita, Pereira Ernesto, Santos Joana, Paulo Graciano, Jorge Elisabete, Brochado Bruno, Melica Bruno, Baptista Gonçalves Rui, Infante de Oliveira Eduardo
Cardiology Department, Centro Hospitalar Universitário do Algarve, Portugal.
Cardiology Department, Centro Hospitalar Universitário do Algarve, Portugal.
Rev Port Cardiol. 2024 Apr;43(4):177-185. doi: 10.1016/j.repc.2023.07.008. Epub 2023 Nov 10.
Concerns surrounding the consequences of ionizing radiation (IR) have increased in interventional cardiology (IC). Despite this, the ever-growing complexity of diseases as well as procedures can lead to greater exposure to radiation. The aim of this survey, led by Portuguese Association of Interventional Cardiology (APIC), was to evaluate the level of awareness and current practices on IR protection among its members.
An online survey was emailed to all APIC members, between August and November 2021. The questionnaire consisted of 50 questions focusing on knowledge and measures of IR protection in the catheterization laboratory. Results were analyzed using descriptive statistics.
From a response rate of 46.9%, the study obtained a total sample of 159 responses (156 selected for analysis). Most survey respondents (66.0%) were unaware of the radiation exposure category, and only 60.4% reported systematically using a dosimeter. A large majority (90.4%) employed techniques to minimize exposure to radiation. All participants used personal protective equipment, despite eyewear protection only being used frequently by 49.2% of main operators. Ceiling suspended shields and table protectors were often used. Only two-thirds were familiar with the legally established limit on radiation doses for workers or the dose that should trigger patient follow-up. Most of the survey respondents had a non-certified training in IR procedures and only 32.0% had attended their yearly occupational health consultation.
Safety methods and protective equipment are largely adopted among interventional cardiologists, who have shown some IR awareness. Despite this, there is room for improvement, especially concerning the use of eyewear protection, monitoring, and certification.
介入心脏病学(IC)领域对电离辐射(IR)后果的担忧日益增加。尽管如此,疾病和手术日益复杂,可能导致更高的辐射暴露。由葡萄牙介入心脏病学协会(APIC)牵头开展的这项调查旨在评估其成员对IR防护的认知水平和当前实践情况。
2021年8月至11月期间,通过电子邮件向所有APIC成员发送了在线调查问卷。问卷包含50个问题,重点关注导管实验室中IR防护的知识和措施。使用描述性统计方法对结果进行分析。
回复率为46.9%,该研究共获得159份回复样本(选取156份进行分析)。大多数调查受访者(66.0%)不知道辐射暴露类别,只有60.4%的人报告系统使用剂量仪。绝大多数(90.4%)采用技术手段尽量减少辐射暴露。所有参与者都使用了个人防护设备,尽管只有49.2%的主要操作人员经常使用眼部防护装备。天花板悬挂式防护屏和手术台防护装置经常被使用。只有三分之二的人熟悉法定的工作人员辐射剂量限值或应触发患者后续检查的剂量。大多数调查受访者接受过未经认证的IR程序培训,只有32.0%的人参加了年度职业健康咨询。
介入心脏病专家在很大程度上采用了安全方法和防护设备,他们表现出了一定的IR防护意识。尽管如此,仍有改进空间,尤其是在眼部防护装备的使用、监测和认证方面。