Komatsu Takumi, Sato Yoshinori, Kuroki Yuichiro, Yoshida Yoshihito, Aoyama Natsumi, Iijima Yoshihiko, Nakamoto Yusuke, Kato Masaki, Kiyokawa Hirofumi, Tanabe Kenichiro, Matsunaga Koutaro, Maehata Tadateru, Yasuda Hiroshi, Matsumoto Nobuyuki, Tateishi Keisuke
Department of Gastroenterology St Marianna University School of Medicine Kanagawa Japan.
Department of Gastroenterology St Marianna University School of Medicine, Yokohama Seibu Hospital Kanagawa Japan.
DEN Open. 2023 Nov 10;4(1):e310. doi: 10.1002/deo2.310. eCollection 2024 Apr.
To investigate endoscopic management and clinical outcomes in patients with non-variceal upper gastrointestinal (GI) bleeding during the coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic.
We retrospectively analyzed the data of 332 patients with non-variceal upper GI bleeding who underwent emergency upper GI endoscopy at three hospitals during the pandemic (April 2020-June 2021) and before the pandemic (January 2019-March 2020). The number of emergency upper GI endoscopies, time from hospital arrival to endoscopy, mortality within 30 days, rebleeding within 30 days, interventional radiology (IVR)/surgery requirement, composite outcome, rates of endoscopic hemostasis procedures, and second-look endoscopy were investigated using logistic regression.
Overall, 152 and 180 patients underwent emergency upper GI endoscopies during and before the pandemic, respectively. The mean time from arrival to endoscopy was longer during the pandemic than before it (11.7 vs. 6.1 h, 0.01). Multivariate analysis revealed that mortality within 30 days (odds ratio [OR]: 2.27, = 0.26), rebleeding within 30 days (OR: 0.43, = 0.17), IVR/surgery requirement (OR: 1.79, = 0.33), and composite outcome (OR: 0.98, = 0.96) did not differ significantly between the periods; conversely, endoscopic hemostasis procedures (OR: 0.38, < 0.01) and second-look endoscopies (OR: 0.04, < 0.01) were less likely to be performed during the pandemic than before it.
Although the time from arrival to endoscopy was significantly longer during the pandemic, it did not affect mortality and rebleeding.
探讨2019冠状病毒病大流行期间非静脉曲张性上消化道出血患者的内镜治疗及临床结局。
我们回顾性分析了332例非静脉曲张性上消化道出血患者的数据,这些患者在大流行期间(2020年4月至2021年6月)和大流行之前(2019年1月至2020年3月)于三家医院接受了急诊上消化道内镜检查。使用逻辑回归分析急诊上消化道内镜检查的次数、从入院到内镜检查的时间、30天内的死亡率、30天内的再出血率、介入放射学(IVR)/手术需求、综合结局、内镜止血程序的发生率以及二次内镜检查情况。
总体而言,分别有152例和180例患者在大流行期间和之前接受了急诊上消化道内镜检查。大流行期间从入院到内镜检查的平均时间比之前更长(11.7小时对6.1小时,<0.01)。多变量分析显示,两个时期之间30天内的死亡率(比值比[OR]:2.27,=0.26)、30天内的再出血率(OR:0.43,=0.17)、IVR/手术需求(OR:1.79,=0.33)和综合结局(OR:0.98,=0.96)无显著差异;相反,大流行期间进行内镜止血程序(OR:0.38,<0.01)和二次内镜检查(OR:0.04,<0.01)的可能性低于大流行之前。
尽管大流行期间从入院到内镜检查的时间显著延长,但这并未影响死亡率和再出血率。