Alkazemi Afrah, Kovacevic Mary, Dube Kevin, Lauffenburger Julie C, Smith Adam, Malinowski Stephen, Weinhouse Gerald L
Department of Pharmacy Practice, College of Pharmacy, Kuwait University, Kuwait City, Kuwait.
Department of Pharmacy, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
J Aerosol Med Pulm Drug Deliv. 2023 Dec;36(6):309-315. doi: 10.1089/jamp.2022.0038. Epub 2023 Nov 14.
The management of severe hemoptysis mainly consists of invasive interventional procedures, including angiographic bronchial artery embolization, various endobronchial interventions, and sometimes surgery. However, there are limited effective noninvasive medical therapies available. The objective of this analysis was to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of nebulized tranexamic acid (TXA) administration compared with conventional management in patients with hemoptysis. This Institutional Review Board-approved, single-center, retrospective matched cohort study was performed from January 1, 2018 to March 31, 2021. Electronic health record data were used to identify all adult inpatients with hemoptysis (International Classification of Diseases, Tenth Revision, code R04.2). All patients who received ≥1 dose of nebulized TXA were matched with up to five controls based on available severity criteria (hemoptysis severity, need for mechanical ventilation, and sequential organ failure assessment score at the time of hemoptysis diagnosis) with coarsened exact matching. The primary outcome was the need for invasive interventions for the management of hemoptysis. Secondary outcomes included time to hemoptysis resolution, duration of mechanical ventilation, hemoptysis recurrence, and hospital length of stay. A total of 14 patients were treated with nebulized TXA; they were matched with 58 controls. Patients were 59.7% male, had a median age of 65.5 years, with airway disease (36.1%) being the major etiology of hemoptysis. There was no difference in the number of patients who required an invasive intervention between the TXA (35.7%) versus control group (56.9%), = 0.344. Additionally, no difference was found in the time to hemoptysis resolution ( = 0.050), duration on mechanical ventilation ( = 0.128), hemoptysis recurrence ( = 1.000), or hospital length of stay ( = 0.139). In patients with hemoptysis, nebulized TXA may be considered as a noninvasive option for the management of hemoptysis. However, a larger analysis is warranted to determine the impact of nebulized TXA on invasive interventions for management.
严重咯血的治疗主要包括侵入性介入程序,如血管造影支气管动脉栓塞术、各种支气管内介入治疗,有时还包括手术。然而,有效的非侵入性药物治疗方法有限。本分析的目的是评估雾化氨甲环酸(TXA)给药与咯血患者传统治疗方法相比的有效性和安全性。这项经机构审查委员会批准的单中心回顾性匹配队列研究于2018年1月1日至2021年3月31日进行。利用电子健康记录数据识别所有成年咯血住院患者(国际疾病分类第十版,代码R04.2)。所有接受≥1剂雾化TXA的患者根据可用的严重程度标准(咯血严重程度、机械通气需求以及咯血诊断时的序贯器官衰竭评估评分)与多达5名对照进行粗精确匹配。主要结局是咯血治疗所需的侵入性干预措施。次要结局包括咯血缓解时间、机械通气持续时间、咯血复发情况以及住院时间。共有14例患者接受了雾化TXA治疗;他们与58名对照进行了匹配。患者中男性占59.7%,中位年龄为65.5岁,气道疾病(36.1%)是咯血的主要病因。TXA组(35.7%)与对照组(56.9%)之间需要侵入性干预的患者数量无差异,P = 0.344。此外,在咯血缓解时间(P = 0.050)、机械通气持续时间(P = 0.128)、咯血复发情况(P = 1.000)或住院时间(P = 0.139)方面未发现差异。对于咯血患者,雾化TXA可被视为咯血治疗的一种非侵入性选择。然而,需要进行更大规模的分析以确定雾化TXA对侵入性治疗干预措施的影响。