SE Research Centre, SE Health, 90 Allstate Parkway, Suite 800, Markham, ON, L3R 6H3, Canada.
School of Public Health Sciences, University of Waterloo, 200 University Avenue West, Waterloo, ON, N2L 3G1, Canada.
BMC Health Serv Res. 2023 Nov 16;23(1):1268. doi: 10.1186/s12913-023-10203-5.
Researchers in the Netherlands proposed the Pillars for Positive Health (PPH) as a broadly encompassing health definition to support more realistic and meaningful care planning for people living with chronic disease and other life-long health conditions. The PPH was subsequently converted to the My Positive Health (MPH) spider web visualization tool. This study sought to identify opportunities for more person-centred care planning at the point of care in home care, using the MPH tool as a framework to link comprehensive assessment and dialogue-based goal-setting.
A modified eDelphi method was used to conduct domain mapping with a purposively sampled expert panel (n = 25). The panel consisted of researchers, health care providers, older adults and caregivers. A two-stage eDelphi process was conducted, with each stage consisting of three survey rounds. In the first stage, participants were asked to map 201 elements of the interRAI Home Care (interRAI HC) comprehensive assessment tool to the six MPH domains or "No pillar of best fit". The second stage focused on identifying opportunities to adapt or expand comprehensive assessment as it relates to the MPH domains.
In Stage 1, 189 of 201 elements reached consensus in domain mapping. These included: 80 elements for Bodily Functions, 32 for Daily Functioning, 32 for Mental Wellbeing, 24 for Quality of Life, 10 for Participation, and 1 for Meaningfulness. Ten elements were identified to have no pillar of best fit. The 12 elements that did not reach consensus in Stage 1 formed the basis for Stage 2, where expert panel participants proposed four new assessment elements in Meaningfulness and Participation and 11 additional descriptors across the six MPH domains. Of these, two elements and nine of the 11 descriptors reached consensus.
Findings show that elements of the interRAI HC are oriented toward the physical, functional, and mental health domains. Consequently, complementary assessment elements and/or tools may be needed to support comprehensive assessment of 'Meaningfulness' and 'Participation' in person-centred home and community care. Additional descriptors may also be needed to aid communication regarding the understanding and application of MPH domains.
荷兰的研究人员提出了积极健康之柱(PPH)作为一个广泛涵盖健康的定义,以支持对患有慢性疾病和其他终身健康状况的人的更现实和更有意义的护理计划。PPH 随后被转换为积极健康之网(MPH)蜘蛛网络图可视化工具。本研究旨在确定在家庭护理中以患者为中心的护理计划的机会,使用 MPH 工具作为链接全面评估和基于对话的目标设定的框架。
采用改良德尔菲法对有目的抽样的专家小组(n=25)进行领域映射。小组由研究人员、医疗保健提供者、老年人及其照顾者组成。进行了两阶段的德尔菲法流程,每个阶段都包含三个调查轮次。在第一阶段,参与者被要求将 interRAI 家庭护理(interRAI HC)全面评估工具的 201 个要素映射到 MPH 的六个领域或“无最佳支柱”。第二阶段侧重于确定适应或扩展与 MPH 领域相关的全面评估的机会。
在第一阶段,201 个要素中有 189 个在领域映射上达成共识。这些要素包括:身体功能 80 个、日常功能 32 个、心理健康 32 个、生活质量 24 个、参与度 10 个和意义感 1 个。10 个要素没有最佳支柱。在第一阶段未达成共识的 12 个要素构成了第二阶段的基础,在第二阶段,专家小组参与者提出了意义感和参与度的四个新评估要素以及六个 MPH 领域的 11 个额外描述符。其中,两个要素和 11 个描述符中的 9 个达成了共识。
研究结果表明,interRAI HC 的要素倾向于身体、功能和心理健康领域。因此,可能需要补充评估要素和/或工具来支持以患者为中心的家庭和社区护理中对“意义感”和“参与度”的全面评估。还可能需要额外的描述符来帮助沟通对 MPH 领域的理解和应用。