Bergman Michael, Lei Zhipeng, Xu Susan, Strickland Kevin, Zhuang Ziqing
National Personal Protective Technology Laboratory, National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health, Pittsburgh, PA 15236, USA.
Proc 20th Congr Int Ergon Assoc IEA 2018 I Healthc Ergon (2018). 2019;819:176-185. doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-96089-0_20. Epub 2018 Aug 5.
Loose-fitting powered air-purifying respirators (PAPRs) are used in healthcare settings to reduce exposure to high-risk respiratory pathogens. Innovative computational fluid dynamics (CFD) models were developed for evaluating loose-fitting PAPR performance. However, the computational results of the CFD models have not been validated using actual experimental data. Experimental testing to evaluate particle facepiece leakage was performed in a test laboratory using two models of loose-fitting PAPRs. Each model was mounted on a static (non-moving) advanced headform placed in a sodium chloride (NaCl) aerosol test chamber. The headform performed cyclic breathing via connection to a breathing machine. High-efficiency particulate air (HEPA)-filtered air was supplied directly to the PAPR facepiece using laboratory compressed supplied-air regulated with a mass-flow controller. One model was evaluated with six supplied-air flowrates from 50-215 L/min (Lpm) and the other model with six flowrates from 50-205 Lpm. Three different workrates (minute volumes) were evaluated: low (25 Lpm), moderate 46 (Lpm), and high 88 (Lpm). Manikin penetration factor (mPF) was calculated as the ratio of chamber particle concentration to the in-facepiece concentration. Overall, data analyses indicated that the mPF results from the simulations were well correlated with the experimental laboratory data for all data combined (r = 0.88). For data at the three different workrates (high, moderate, low) for both models combined, the r-values were 0.96, 0.97, and 0.77, respectively. The CFD models of the two PAPR models were validated and may be utilized for further research.
宽松型动力空气净化呼吸器(PAPR)用于医疗环境中,以减少接触高风险呼吸道病原体。开发了创新的计算流体动力学(CFD)模型来评估宽松型PAPR的性能。然而,CFD模型的计算结果尚未使用实际实验数据进行验证。在测试实验室中使用两种型号的宽松型PAPR进行了评估颗粒面罩泄漏的实验测试。每个型号都安装在放置在氯化钠(NaCl)气溶胶测试室内的静态(不移动)高级头模上。头模通过连接呼吸机进行周期性呼吸。使用由质量流量控制器调节的实验室压缩供应空气将高效空气过滤器(HEPA)过滤后的空气直接供应到PAPR面罩。一种型号在50 - 215升/分钟(Lpm)的六种供应空气流量下进行评估,另一种型号在50 - 205 Lpm的六种流量下进行评估。评估了三种不同的工作速率(分钟通气量):低(25 Lpm)、中(46 Lpm)和高(88 Lpm)。人体模型穿透因子(mPF)计算为测试室内颗粒浓度与面罩内浓度之比。总体而言,数据分析表明,所有数据合并后,模拟得到的mPF结果与实验室实验数据具有良好的相关性(r = 0.88)。对于两种型号合并后的三种不同工作速率(高、中、低)的数据,r值分别为0.96、0.97和0.77。两种PAPR型号的CFD模型得到了验证,可用于进一步研究。