• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

保守治疗阑尾脓肿后行间隔期阑尾切除术的安全性和可行性:一项回顾性单中心队列研究。

Interval appendectomy as a safe and feasible treatment approach after conservative treatment for appendicitis with abscess: a retrospective, single-center cohort study.

机构信息

Department of Surgery, Hanyu General Hospital, Hanyushi Saitama, 348-8505, Japan.

出版信息

Updates Surg. 2023 Dec;75(8):2257-2265. doi: 10.1007/s13304-023-01679-1. Epub 2023 Nov 21.

DOI:10.1007/s13304-023-01679-1
PMID:37987979
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10710379/
Abstract

Emergency appendectomy (EA) is the gold standard management for acute appendicitis (AA). However, whether EA or interval appendectomy (IA) after conservative treatment is the optimal approach in AA with abscess remains controversial. This study compared IA and EA in patients presenting with AA accompanied by abscess. This was a retrospective single-center study including 446 consecutive patients undergoing appendectomy between April 2009 and March 2023. AA with abscess was defined as a pericecal abscess observed by computed tomography or abdominal ultrasonography, and patients with signs of peritoneal irritation were excluded. Perioperative outcomes were compared between the patients who directly underwent EA and those who underwent IA after conservative treatment. Among 42 patients (9.4%) with AA and abscess, 34 and 8 patients underwent IA and EA, respectively. The rates of ileocecal resection and postoperative complications were lower in the IA group than in the EA group (3% vs. 50%, P < 0.001 and 9% vs. 75%, P < 0.001, respectively). Colonoscopy before IA was performed in 16 of the 17 patients aged ≥ 40 years in the IA group, and one patient underwent ileocecal resection because of suspicious neoplasm in the root of the appendix. IA after conservative treatment might be considered as the useful therapeutic option for AA with abscess. Colonoscopy during the waiting period between the initial diagnosis and IA should be considered in patients aged ≥ 40 years who may have malignant changes. Implementing IA as a first-line treatment will be beneficial to both patients and healthcare providers.

摘要

急诊阑尾切除术(EA)是急性阑尾炎(AA)的金标准治疗方法。然而,对于伴有脓肿的 AA,EA 或保守治疗后行间隔阑尾切除术(IA)哪种方法是最佳的仍存在争议。本研究比较了伴有脓肿的 AA 患者行 IA 和 EA 的情况。这是一项回顾性单中心研究,纳入了 2009 年 4 月至 2023 年 3 月期间连续 446 例行阑尾切除术的患者。AA 伴脓肿定义为 CT 或腹部超声检查发现的盲肠周围脓肿,且排除有腹膜刺激征的患者。比较了直接行 EA 和保守治疗后行 IA 的患者的围手术期结局。在 42 例(9.4%)AA 伴脓肿的患者中,分别有 34 例和 8 例患者行 IA 和 EA,IA 组的回盲部切除术率和术后并发症发生率均低于 EA 组(3%比 50%,P<0.001;9%比 75%,P<0.001)。IA 组中 17 例年龄≥40 岁的患者中有 16 例行结肠镜检查,其中 1 例因阑尾根部可疑肿瘤行回盲部切除术。对于伴有脓肿的 AA,IA 作为一种保守治疗后的治疗选择可能是有用的。对于可能有恶性变化的年龄≥40 岁的患者,在初始诊断和 IA 之间的等待期间应考虑行结肠镜检查。将 IA 作为一线治疗将使患者和医疗保健提供者都受益。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f6c0/10710379/30ae57523ac5/13304_2023_1679_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f6c0/10710379/2bf1fcbfe57d/13304_2023_1679_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f6c0/10710379/0b2a6e41adf6/13304_2023_1679_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f6c0/10710379/8a6948ff2dcc/13304_2023_1679_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f6c0/10710379/30ae57523ac5/13304_2023_1679_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f6c0/10710379/2bf1fcbfe57d/13304_2023_1679_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f6c0/10710379/0b2a6e41adf6/13304_2023_1679_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f6c0/10710379/8a6948ff2dcc/13304_2023_1679_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f6c0/10710379/30ae57523ac5/13304_2023_1679_Fig4_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Interval appendectomy as a safe and feasible treatment approach after conservative treatment for appendicitis with abscess: a retrospective, single-center cohort study.保守治疗阑尾脓肿后行间隔期阑尾切除术的安全性和可行性:一项回顾性单中心队列研究。
Updates Surg. 2023 Dec;75(8):2257-2265. doi: 10.1007/s13304-023-01679-1. Epub 2023 Nov 21.
2
Outcomes of interval appendectomy in comparison with appendectomy for acute appendicitis.间隔期阑尾切除术与急性阑尾炎阑尾切除术的疗效比较。
J Surg Res. 2018 May;225:90-94. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2018.01.012. Epub 2018 Feb 21.
3
Abscess and symptoms duration upon presentation should guide decision algorithms for early versus interval appendectomy in children.脓肿和症状出现的持续时间应指导儿童早期与间隔性阑尾切除术的决策算法。
Pediatr Neonatol. 2019 Oct;60(5):530-536. doi: 10.1016/j.pedneo.2019.01.005. Epub 2019 Jan 19.
4
The experiences of interval appendectomy for inflammatory appendiceal mass.炎性阑尾包块的间隔期阑尾切除术的经验。
Pediatr Int. 2021 Jan;63(1):88-93. doi: 10.1111/ped.14358. Epub 2021 Jan 7.
5
Interval laparoscopic appendectomy after laparotomy drainage for acute appendicitis with abscess: A case report.剖腹引流术后间隔期行腹腔镜阑尾切除术治疗急性阑尾炎伴脓肿:一例报告
Int J Surg Case Rep. 2022 Jul;96:107319. doi: 10.1016/j.ijscr.2022.107319. Epub 2022 Jun 18.
6
Conservative approach versus urgent appendectomy in surgical management of acute appendicitis with abscess or phlegmon.保守治疗与急诊手术治疗急性阑尾炎伴脓肿或蜂窝织炎的比较。
Rev Esp Enferm Dig. 2010 Nov;102(11):648-52. doi: 10.4321/s1130-01082010001100005.
7
Histological analysis of appendices removed during interval appendectomy after conservative management of pediatric patients with acute appendicitis with an inflammatory mass or abscess.对患有急性阑尾炎并伴有炎性肿块或脓肿的儿科患者进行保守治疗后,在间隔期阑尾切除术中切除的阑尾进行组织学分析。
Surg Today. 2014 Aug;44(8):1400-5. doi: 10.1007/s00595-014-0950-0. Epub 2014 Jun 17.
8
Risk of Appendiceal Neoplasm in Periappendicular Abscess in Patients Treated With Interval Appendectomy vs Follow-up With Magnetic Resonance Imaging: 1-Year Outcomes of the Peri-Appendicitis Acuta Randomized Clinical Trial.经间隔阑尾切除术治疗的患者阑尾周围脓肿与磁共振成像随访相比阑尾周围脓肿的阑尾肿瘤风险:急性阑尾炎围手术期随机临床试验的 1 年结果。
JAMA Surg. 2019 Mar 1;154(3):200-207. doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2018.4373.
9
Transumbilical Single-Incision Laparoscopic-Assisted Appendectomy (TULAA) Is Useful in Adults and Young Adolescents: Comparison with Multi-Port Laparoscopic Appendectomy.经脐单切口腹腔镜辅助阑尾切除术(TULAA)在成年和青少年中均有效:与多孔腹腔镜阑尾切除术的比较。
Medicina (Kaunas). 2019 Jun 5;55(6):248. doi: 10.3390/medicina55060248.
10
Routine interval appendectomy is not justified after initial nonoperative treatment of acute appendicitis.急性阑尾炎初次非手术治疗后,常规进行间隔期阑尾切除术并无道理。
Arch Surg. 2005 Sep;140(9):897-901. doi: 10.1001/archsurg.140.9.897.

引用本文的文献

1
Clinical significance of peri-appendiceal abscess and phlegmon in acute complicated appendicitis patients undergoing emergency appendectomy.急性复杂性阑尾炎患者急诊阑尾切除术中阑尾周围脓肿和蜂窝织炎的临床意义
World J Gastrointest Surg. 2024 Oct 27;16(10):3123-3132. doi: 10.4240/wjgs.v16.i10.3123.
2
Clinical significance of appendicoliths in conservative treatment of acute complicated appendicitis patients with peri-appendiceal abscess: a single-center retrospective study.阑尾结石在急性复杂性阑尾炎伴阑尾周围脓肿患者保守治疗中的临床意义:一项单中心回顾性研究
Ann Med Surg (Lond). 2024 Sep 30;86(11):6440-6446. doi: 10.1097/MS9.0000000000002634. eCollection 2024 Nov.
3

本文引用的文献

1
Laparoscopic appendectomy for acute appendicitis in patients with COVID-19 confirmation: A case report.确诊 COVID-19 患者急性阑尾炎的腹腔镜阑尾切除术:一例报告。
Int J Surg Case Rep. 2022 Nov;100:107740. doi: 10.1016/j.ijscr.2022.107740. Epub 2022 Oct 11.
2
Interval laparoscopic appendectomy after laparotomy drainage for acute appendicitis with abscess: A case report.剖腹引流术后间隔期行腹腔镜阑尾切除术治疗急性阑尾炎伴脓肿:一例报告
Int J Surg Case Rep. 2022 Jul;96:107319. doi: 10.1016/j.ijscr.2022.107319. Epub 2022 Jun 18.
3
Diagnosis and Management of Acute Appendicitis in Adults: A Review.
Three reasons to consider interval appendectomy for the management of complicated appendicitis.
考虑行间隔期阑尾切除术治疗复杂性阑尾炎的三个原因。
Updates Surg. 2024 Jun;76(3):1121-1122. doi: 10.1007/s13304-024-01788-5. Epub 2024 Mar 9.
成人急性阑尾炎的诊断与管理:综述
JAMA. 2021 Dec 14;326(22):2299-2311. doi: 10.1001/jama.2021.20502.
4
Is interval appendectomy really needed? A closer look at neoplasm rates in adult patients undergoing interval appendectomy after complicated appendicitis.真的需要进行间隔期阑尾切除术吗?深入研究复杂性阑尾炎后接受间隔期阑尾切除术的成年患者的肿瘤发生率。
Surg Endosc. 2021 Jul;35(7):3855-3860. doi: 10.1007/s00464-020-07798-9. Epub 2020 Jul 16.
5
Diagnosis and treatment of acute appendicitis: 2020 update of the WSES Jerusalem guidelines.急性阑尾炎的诊断和治疗:WSES 耶路撒冷指南 2020 年更新版。
World J Emerg Surg. 2020 Apr 15;15(1):27. doi: 10.1186/s13017-020-00306-3.
6
Clinical outcomes of single-site laparoscopic interval appendectomy for severe complicated appendicitis: Comparison to conventional emergency appendectomy.单孔腹腔镜间隔期阑尾切除术治疗重度复杂性阑尾炎的临床疗效:与传统急诊阑尾切除术的比较
Ann Gastroenterol Surg. 2019 Jul 17;3(5):561-567. doi: 10.1002/ags3.12277. eCollection 2019 Sep.
7
Predictors for interval appendectomy in non-operatively treated complicated appendicitis.非手术治疗的复杂性阑尾炎行间隔期阑尾切除术的预测因素。
Int J Colorectal Dis. 2019 Jul;34(7):1325-1332. doi: 10.1007/s00384-019-03303-4. Epub 2019 Jun 7.
8
Management of acute appendicitis in adults: A practice management guideline from the Eastern Association for the Surgery of Trauma.成人急性阑尾炎的管理:东部创伤外科学会的实践管理指南。
J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2019 Jul;87(1):214-224. doi: 10.1097/TA.0000000000002270.
9
Risk of Appendiceal Neoplasm in Periappendicular Abscess in Patients Treated With Interval Appendectomy vs Follow-up With Magnetic Resonance Imaging: 1-Year Outcomes of the Peri-Appendicitis Acuta Randomized Clinical Trial.经间隔阑尾切除术治疗的患者阑尾周围脓肿与磁共振成像随访相比阑尾周围脓肿的阑尾肿瘤风险:急性阑尾炎围手术期随机临床试验的 1 年结果。
JAMA Surg. 2019 Mar 1;154(3):200-207. doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2018.4373.
10
Complicated appendicitis and considerations for interval appendectomy.复杂性阑尾炎及间隔期阑尾切除术的考量
JAAPA. 2018 Sep;31(9):35-41. doi: 10.1097/01.JAA.0000544304.30954.40.