Suppr超能文献

保守治疗阑尾脓肿后行间隔期阑尾切除术的安全性和可行性:一项回顾性单中心队列研究。

Interval appendectomy as a safe and feasible treatment approach after conservative treatment for appendicitis with abscess: a retrospective, single-center cohort study.

机构信息

Department of Surgery, Hanyu General Hospital, Hanyushi Saitama, 348-8505, Japan.

出版信息

Updates Surg. 2023 Dec;75(8):2257-2265. doi: 10.1007/s13304-023-01679-1. Epub 2023 Nov 21.

Abstract

Emergency appendectomy (EA) is the gold standard management for acute appendicitis (AA). However, whether EA or interval appendectomy (IA) after conservative treatment is the optimal approach in AA with abscess remains controversial. This study compared IA and EA in patients presenting with AA accompanied by abscess. This was a retrospective single-center study including 446 consecutive patients undergoing appendectomy between April 2009 and March 2023. AA with abscess was defined as a pericecal abscess observed by computed tomography or abdominal ultrasonography, and patients with signs of peritoneal irritation were excluded. Perioperative outcomes were compared between the patients who directly underwent EA and those who underwent IA after conservative treatment. Among 42 patients (9.4%) with AA and abscess, 34 and 8 patients underwent IA and EA, respectively. The rates of ileocecal resection and postoperative complications were lower in the IA group than in the EA group (3% vs. 50%, P < 0.001 and 9% vs. 75%, P < 0.001, respectively). Colonoscopy before IA was performed in 16 of the 17 patients aged ≥ 40 years in the IA group, and one patient underwent ileocecal resection because of suspicious neoplasm in the root of the appendix. IA after conservative treatment might be considered as the useful therapeutic option for AA with abscess. Colonoscopy during the waiting period between the initial diagnosis and IA should be considered in patients aged ≥ 40 years who may have malignant changes. Implementing IA as a first-line treatment will be beneficial to both patients and healthcare providers.

摘要

急诊阑尾切除术(EA)是急性阑尾炎(AA)的金标准治疗方法。然而,对于伴有脓肿的 AA,EA 或保守治疗后行间隔阑尾切除术(IA)哪种方法是最佳的仍存在争议。本研究比较了伴有脓肿的 AA 患者行 IA 和 EA 的情况。这是一项回顾性单中心研究,纳入了 2009 年 4 月至 2023 年 3 月期间连续 446 例行阑尾切除术的患者。AA 伴脓肿定义为 CT 或腹部超声检查发现的盲肠周围脓肿,且排除有腹膜刺激征的患者。比较了直接行 EA 和保守治疗后行 IA 的患者的围手术期结局。在 42 例(9.4%)AA 伴脓肿的患者中,分别有 34 例和 8 例患者行 IA 和 EA,IA 组的回盲部切除术率和术后并发症发生率均低于 EA 组(3%比 50%,P<0.001;9%比 75%,P<0.001)。IA 组中 17 例年龄≥40 岁的患者中有 16 例行结肠镜检查,其中 1 例因阑尾根部可疑肿瘤行回盲部切除术。对于伴有脓肿的 AA,IA 作为一种保守治疗后的治疗选择可能是有用的。对于可能有恶性变化的年龄≥40 岁的患者,在初始诊断和 IA 之间的等待期间应考虑行结肠镜检查。将 IA 作为一线治疗将使患者和医疗保健提供者都受益。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f6c0/10710379/2bf1fcbfe57d/13304_2023_1679_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验