Kron J, Li C K, Murphy E, Broudy D, Morris C, Griffith K, McAnulty J H
West J Med. 1986 Nov;145(5):639-44.
To determine prospectively whether electrophysiologic testing is prognostically useful following a myocardial infarction, 38 patients were studied. Ventricular tachycardia was induced in 32 of 38 (84%) patients (sustained in 12) and was significantly increased with the use of three or four extrastimuli. In 17 months' mean follow-up, 4 patients died suddenly or survived an episode of sustained ventricular tachycardia. Programmed ventricular stimulation was a sensitive but not a specific predictor of these events with an overall 24% predictive accuracy. The use of one or two extrastimuli substantially improved specificity but was insensitive in predicting sudden death or ventricular tachycardia. Programmed ventricular stimulation soon after uncomplicated myocardial infarction was not a useful prognostic indicator for sudden death or subsequent ventricular tachycardia.
为前瞻性地确定心肌梗死后电生理检查是否具有预后价值,对38例患者进行了研究。38例患者中有32例(84%)诱发出室性心动过速(12例为持续性),使用三个或四个期外刺激时室性心动过速诱发率显著增加。平均随访17个月时,4例患者发生猝死或经历持续性室性心动过速发作后存活。程控心室刺激是这些事件的敏感但非特异性预测指标,总体预测准确率为24%。使用一个或两个期外刺激可显著提高特异性,但对猝死或室性心动过速的预测不敏感。无并发症心肌梗死后不久进行的程控心室刺激对猝死或随后的室性心动过速并非有用的预后指标。