• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

如何辨别二元论者?

How to Tell a Dualist?

作者信息

Berent Iris

机构信息

Department of Psychology, Northeastern University.

出版信息

Cogn Sci. 2023 Nov;47(11):e13380. doi: 10.1111/cogs.13380.

DOI:10.1111/cogs.13380
PMID:37992196
Abstract

People exhibit conflicting intuitions concerning the mind/body links. Here, I explore a novel explanation for these inconsistencies: Dualism is a violable constraint that interacts with Essentialism. Two experiments probe these interactions. In Experiment 1, participants evaluated the emergence of psychological traits in either a replica of one's body, or in the afterlife-after the body's demise. In line with Dualism, epistemic (i.e., disembodied) traits (e.g., knowing the contrast between good/bad) were considered more likely to emerge (relative to sensorimotor/affective traits) only in the afterlife. However, so were innate traits (in line with Essentialism). To further gauge Essentialism, Experiment 2 presented the same traits to innateness judgments. Here, sensorimotor/affective (i.e., embodied) traits were considered more likely to be innate, suggesting that innateness intuitions are informed by embodiment. Moreover, innateness judgments (in Experiment 2) and embodiment intuitions (in Experiment 1) correlated. These results suggest that Dualism tacitly constrains reasoning about one's innate origins and its persistence after death. But since Dualism is "soft" and interacts with Essentialism, supernatural intuitions are chimeric, not purely ethereal.

摘要

人们在身心联系方面表现出相互矛盾的直觉。在此,我探讨了对这些不一致现象的一种新颖解释:二元论是一种可被违背的约束,它与本质主义相互作用。两项实验探究了这些相互作用。在实验1中,参与者评估心理特质是在一个人的身体复制品中出现,还是在身体消亡后的来世中出现。与二元论一致,认知(即非实体的)特质(例如,知晓善恶之分)被认为仅在来世更有可能出现(相对于感觉运动/情感特质而言)。然而,先天特质也是如此(与本质主义一致)。为了进一步衡量本质主义,实验2将相同的特质用于先天判断。在此,感觉运动/情感(即实体化的)特质被认为更有可能是先天的,这表明先天直觉受到实体化的影响。此外,(实验2中的)先天判断和(实验1中的)实体化直觉存在相关性。这些结果表明,二元论默认限制了关于一个人先天起源及其死后存续的推理。但由于二元论是“软性的”且与本质主义相互作用,超自然直觉是虚幻的,并非纯粹空灵的。

相似文献

1
How to Tell a Dualist?如何辨别二元论者?
Cogn Sci. 2023 Nov;47(11):e13380. doi: 10.1111/cogs.13380.
2
Autism attenuates the perception of the mind-body divide.自闭症削弱了身心二分的感知。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2022 Dec 6;119(49):e2211628119. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2211628119. Epub 2022 Nov 30.
3
On the matter of essence.论本质问题。
Cognition. 2021 Aug;213:104701. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2021.104701. Epub 2021 Mar 31.
4
Can we get human nature right?我们能否正确认识人性?
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2021 Sep 28;118(39). doi: 10.1073/pnas.2108274118.
5
People's Intuitions About Innateness.人们对先天性的直觉。
Open Mind (Camb). 2019 Oct 1;3:101-114. doi: 10.1162/opmi_a_00029. eCollection 2019.
6
The "Hard Problem of Consciousness" Arises from Human Psychology.“意识的难题”源于人类心理学。
Open Mind (Camb). 2023 Aug 11;7:564-587. doi: 10.1162/opmi_a_00094. eCollection 2023.
7
The illusion of the mind-body divide is attenuated in males.心身二分的幻觉在男性中减弱。
Sci Rep. 2023 Apr 24;13(1):6653. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-33079-1.
8
Intuitive Dualism and Afterlife Beliefs: A Cross-Cultural Study.直观二元论和来世信仰:跨文化研究。
Cogn Sci. 2021 Jun;45(6):e12992. doi: 10.1111/cogs.12992.
9
Is Identity Essentialism a Fundamental Feature of Human Cognition?身份本质主义是否是人类认知的基本特征?
Cogn Sci. 2023 May;47(5):e13292. doi: 10.1111/cogs.13292.
10
Do Obligations Follow the Mind or Body?义务随身心走?
Cogn Sci. 2023 Jul;47(7):e13317. doi: 10.1111/cogs.13317.

引用本文的文献

1
Consciousness isn't "hard"-it's human psychology that makes it so!意识并非“难以理解”——是人类心理学使其如此!
Neurosci Conscious. 2024 Apr 3;2024(1):niae016. doi: 10.1093/nc/niae016. eCollection 2024.
2
Davinci the Dualist: The Mind-Body Divide in Large Language Models and in Human Learners.二元论者达·芬奇:大语言模型与人类学习者中的身心二元论
Open Mind (Camb). 2024 Mar 1;8:84-101. doi: 10.1162/opmi_a_00120. eCollection 2024.