Unit of Endocrinology and Metabolic Diseases, AOU University of Campania "Luigi Vanvitelli", Naples, Italy.
Department of Advanced Medical and Surgical Sciences, University of Campania "Luigi Vanvitelli", Naples, Italy.
Endocrine. 2024 May;84(2):560-570. doi: 10.1007/s12020-023-03604-3. Epub 2023 Nov 25.
Our purposes were: 1) to estimate the prediction performance (PP) of cytology in identifying papillary thyroid carcinoma (PTC) subtypes; 2) to explore how the PTC subtypes distribute among the American College of Radiology (ACR) Thyroid Imaging Reporting and Data System (TI-RADS) categories.
Nodules were included if both the histology with the PTC subtype report and the cytology report with the possible PTC subtype were available. The PP was calculated by making the proportion of True positives/False positives+false negatives.
309 cytologically "suspicious for malignancy" and "malignant" thyroid nodules with PTC histology were evaluated. ACR TI-RADS categorization for classical PTC was significantly different from non-classical PTC (p-value 0.02). For the whole cohort the PP of cytologically classical cases was 0.74, while that of cytologically non classical cases was 0.41. ACR TI-RADS categorization was not significantly different for aggressive vs non-aggressive PTC subtypes (p-value 0.1). When considering only aggressive or non-aggressive PTC subtypes, the PP of cytologically classical cases was respectively 0.86 and 0.87, while that of cytologically non classical cases was respectively 0.27 and 0.22. The PP of cytologically classical cases was 0.73 and 0.79, respectively for macroPTCs and microPTCs, while that of cytologically non classical cases was 0.55 and 0.33, respectively for macroPTCs and microPTCs.
Cytology examination reliably performed in predicting classical PTC versus non classical PTC subtypes. ACR TI-RADS categorization was significantly different among classical PTC versus non classical PTC subtypes.
我们的目的是:1)评估细胞学在识别甲状腺乳头状癌(PTC)亚型方面的预测性能(PP);2)探讨 PTC 亚型在美国放射学院(ACR)甲状腺影像报告和数据系统(TI-RADS)分类中的分布情况。
如果组织学报告有 PTC 亚型且细胞学报告有可能的 PTC 亚型,则纳入结节。通过计算真阳性/假阳性+假阴性的比例来计算 PP。
评估了 309 个细胞学“疑似恶性”和“恶性”甲状腺结节,具有 PTC 组织学。ACR TI-RADS 分类对于经典型 PTC 与非经典型 PTC 有显著差异(p 值 0.02)。对于整个队列,细胞学经典病例的 PP 为 0.74,而细胞学非经典病例的 PP 为 0.41。ACR TI-RADS 分类对于侵袭性与非侵袭性 PTC 亚型无显著差异(p 值 0.1)。当仅考虑侵袭性或非侵袭性 PTC 亚型时,细胞学经典病例的 PP 分别为 0.86 和 0.87,而细胞学非经典病例的 PP 分别为 0.27 和 0.22。细胞学经典病例的 PP 分别为 0.73 和 0.79,用于大 PTC 和小 PTC,而细胞学非经典病例的 PP 分别为 0.55 和 0.33,用于大 PTC 和小 PTC。
细胞学检查在预测经典型 PTC 与非经典型 PTC 亚型方面表现可靠。ACR TI-RADS 分类在经典型 PTC 与非经典型 PTC 亚型之间有显著差异。