Centre for Research in Epidemiology and Population Health (Inserm U1018), Villejuif, France.
Paris-Saclay University, UVSQ, Inserm, CESP, Villejuif, France.
BMC Med. 2023 Nov 24;21(1):463. doi: 10.1186/s12916-023-03156-3.
High rates of discontinuation undermine the effectiveness of adjuvant endocrine therapy (AET) among hormone-receptive breast cancer patients. Patient prognosis also relies on the successful management of cardiovascular risk, which affects a high proportion of postmenopausal women. As with AET, adherence with cardiovascular drugs is suboptimal. We examined whether patient adherence with cardiovascular drugs was associated with the rate of AET discontinuation in a French nationwide claims database linked with hospitalisation data.
We identified postmenopausal women starting AET between 01/01/2016 and 31/12/2020 and taking at least two drugs for the primary prevention of cardiovascular disease (antihypertensive drugs, lipid-lowering drugs and platelet aggregation inhibitors) before AET initiation. Adherence was assessed for each drug class by computing the proportion of days covered. Women were categorised as fully adherent, partially adherent or fully non-adherent with their cardiovascular drug regimen based on whether they adhered with all, part or none of their drugs. AET discontinuation was defined as a 90-day gap in AET availability. Time to AET discontinuation according to levels of cardiovascular drug adherence was estimated using cumulative incidence curves, accounting for the competing risks of death and cancer recurrence. Multivariate cause-specific Cox regressions and Fine-and-Gray regressions were used to assess the relative hazards of AET discontinuation.
In total, 32,075 women fit the inclusion criteria. Women who were fully adherent with their cardiovascular drugs had the lowest cumulative incidence of AET discontinuation at any point over the 5-year follow-up period. At 5 years, 40.2% of fully non-adherent women had discontinued AET compared with 33.5% of partially adherent women and 28.8% of fully adherent women. Both partial adherence and full non-adherence with cardiovascular drugs were predictors of AET discontinuation in the two models (cause-specific hazard ratios 1.16 [95% CI 1.10-1.22] and 1.49 [95% CI 1.39-1.58]; subdistribution hazard ratios 1.15 [95% CI 1.10-1.21] and 1.47 [95% CI 1.38-1.57]).
Clinicians should be aware that patients who do not adhere with their entire cardiovascular drug regimen are also more likely to discontinue AET. This stresses the importance of integrated care, as suboptimal adherence with both treatment components poses a threat to achieving ideal patient outcomes.
在激素受体阳性乳腺癌患者中,高停药率削弱了辅助内分泌治疗(AET)的效果。患者预后还依赖于心血管风险的成功管理,这影响了很大一部分绝经后妇女。与 AET 一样,心血管药物的依从性也不理想。我们在一个与住院数据相关联的法国全国性索赔数据库中,检查了患者对心血管药物的依从性是否与 AET 停药率相关。
我们确定了 2016 年 1 月 1 日至 2020 年 12 月 31 日期间开始 AET 的绝经后妇女,并且在开始 AET 之前至少服用了两种用于心血管疾病一级预防的药物(抗高血压药物、降脂药物和血小板聚集抑制剂)。通过计算每个药物类别的覆盖天数来评估药物的依从性。根据患者是否完全、部分或完全不依从他们的心血管药物方案,将女性分为完全依从、部分依从或完全不依从。AET 停药定义为 AET 供应中断 90 天。使用累积发病率曲线估计根据心血管药物依从性水平的 AET 停药时间,同时考虑死亡和癌症复发的竞争风险。多变量特定原因 Cox 回归和 Fine-and-Gray 回归用于评估 AET 停药的相对风险。
共有 32075 名女性符合纳入标准。在 5 年的随访期间,完全依从心血管药物的女性在任何时候的 AET 停药累积发生率最低。5 年后,40.2%的完全不依从女性停止了 AET,而部分依从的女性为 33.5%,完全依从的女性为 28.8%。两种模型均显示,部分依从和完全不依从心血管药物是 AET 停药的预测因素(特定原因风险比 1.16[95%CI 1.10-1.22]和 1.49[95%CI 1.39-1.58];亚分布风险比 1.15[95%CI 1.10-1.21]和 1.47[95%CI 1.38-1.57])。
临床医生应意识到,不依从整个心血管药物治疗方案的患者也更有可能停止 AET。这强调了综合护理的重要性,因为两种治疗成分的依从性不理想都会对实现理想的患者结局构成威胁。