Manna Lorenzo, Rapuano Lembo Rosa, Yoshioka Asami, Nakamura Koji, Passariello Margherita, De Lorenzo Claudia
Department of Molecular Medicine and Medical Biotechnology, University of Naples "Federico II", Via Pansini 5, 80131 Naples, Italy.
Ceinge-Biotecnologie Avanzate s.c.a.r.l., Via Gaetano Salvatore 486, 80145 Naples, Italy.
Cancers (Basel). 2023 Nov 9;15(22):5345. doi: 10.3390/cancers15225345.
Many advances in antitumor therapies have been achieved with antagonistic antibodies targeting the programmed cell death protein 1 (PD-1) or its ligand (PD-L1); however, many cancer patients still develop resistance to anti-PD-1/PD-L1 treatments often associated with the upregulation of other immune checkpoints such as Lymphocyte Activation Gene-3 (LAG-3). In order to verify whether it is possible to overcome these limits, we analyzed and compared the effects of combinations of the clinically validated anti-LAG-3 mAb (Relatlimab) with anti-PD-1 (Pembrolizumab) or anti-PD-L1 (Atezolizumab) monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) with those of novel bispecific tribodies (TRs), called TR0304 and TR0506, previously generated in our lab by combining the binding moieties of novel human antibodies targeting the same ICs of the mentioned mAbs. In particular, TR0304, made up of a Fab derived from an anti-PD-L1 mAb and two single-chain variable fragments (scFvs) derived from an anti-LAG-3 mAb, was tested in comparison with Relatlimab plus Atezolizumab, and TR0506, made up of an antigen-binding fragment (Fab) derived from the same anti-LAG-3 mAb and two scFvs derived from an anti-PD-1 mAb, was tested in comparison with Relatlimab and Pembrolizumab. We found that the two novel TRs showed similar binding affinity to the targets with respect to validated mAbs, even though they recognized distinct or only partially overlapping epitopes. When tested for their functional properties, they showed an increased ability to induce lymphocyte activation and stronger in vitro cytotoxicity against tumor cells compared to combinatorial treatments of clinically validated mAbs. Considering that tribodies also have other advantages with respect to combinatorial treatments, such as reduced production costs and lower dose requirements, we think that these novel immunomodulatory TRs could be used for therapeutic applications, particularly in monotherapy-resistant cancer patients.
通过靶向程序性细胞死亡蛋白1(PD-1)或其配体(PD-L1)的拮抗性抗体,抗肿瘤治疗已取得了许多进展;然而,许多癌症患者仍会对抗PD-1/PD-L1治疗产生耐药性,这通常与其他免疫检查点如淋巴细胞激活基因-3(LAG-3)的上调有关。为了验证是否有可能克服这些限制,我们分析并比较了临床验证的抗LAG-3单克隆抗体(Relatlimab)与抗PD-1(帕博利珠单抗)或抗PD-L1(阿替利珠单抗)单克隆抗体(mAb)的组合,以及我们实验室先前通过组合靶向上述mAb相同免疫检查点的新型人源抗体的结合部分而产生的新型双特异性三抗体(TR)TR0304和TR0506的效果。具体而言,由源自抗PD-L1 mAb的Fab和源自抗LAG-3 mAb的两个单链可变片段(scFv)组成的TR0304,与Relatlimab加阿替利珠单抗进行了比较测试;由源自同一抗LAG-3 mAb的抗原结合片段(Fab)和源自抗PD-1 mAb的两个scFv组成的TR0506,与Relatlimab和帕博利珠单抗进行了比较测试。我们发现,这两种新型TR与经过验证的mAb相比,对靶点显示出相似的结合亲和力,尽管它们识别的表位不同或仅部分重叠。在测试其功能特性时,与经过临床验证的mAb的联合治疗相比,它们显示出诱导淋巴细胞激活的能力增强,以及对肿瘤细胞更强的体外细胞毒性。考虑到三抗体相对于联合治疗还有其他优势,如生产成本降低和剂量需求更低,我们认为这些新型免疫调节性TR可用于治疗应用,特别是在对单一疗法耐药的癌症患者中。