Suppr超能文献

运动皮层抑制性或兴奋性θ波爆发刺激后单脉冲经颅磁刺激的早期血流动力学反应比较

The Comparison of Early Hemodynamic Response to Single-Pulse Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation following Inhibitory or Excitatory Theta Burst Stimulation on Motor Cortex.

作者信息

Gorban Corina, Zhang Zhongxing, Mensen Armand, Khatami Ramin

机构信息

Center for Sleep Medicine, Sleep Research and Epileptology, Clinic Barmelweid, 5017 Barmelweid, Switzerland.

Department of Neurology, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, 3012 Bern, Switzerland.

出版信息

Brain Sci. 2023 Nov 20;13(11):1609. doi: 10.3390/brainsci13111609.

Abstract

We present a new study design aiming to enhance the understanding of the mechanism by which continuous theta burst stimulation (cTBS) or intermittent theta burst stimulation (iTBS) paradigms elicit cortical modulation. Using near-infrared spectroscopy (NIRS), we compared the cortical hemodynamics of the previously inhibited (after cTBS) or excited (after iTBS) left primary motor cortex (M1) as elicited by single-pulse TMS (spTMS) in a cross-over design. Mean relative changes in hemodynamics within 6 s of the stimulus were compared using a two-sample -test ( < 0.05) and linear mixed model between real and sham stimuli and between stimuli after cTBS and iTBS. Only spTMS after cTBS resulted in a significant increase ( = 0.04) in blood volume (BV) compared to baseline. There were no significant changes in other hemodynamic parameters (oxygenated/deoxygenated hemoglobin). spTMS after cTBS induced a larger increase in BV than spTMS after iTBS ( = 0.021) and sham stimulus after cTBS ( = 0.009). BV showed no significant difference between real and sham stimuli after iTBS ( = 0.37). The greater hemodynamic changes suggest increased vasomotor reactivity after cTBS compared to iTBS. In addition, cTBS could decrease lateral inhibition, allowing activation of surrounding areas after cTBS.

摘要

我们提出了一种新的研究设计,旨在增强对连续theta爆发刺激(cTBS)或间歇性theta爆发刺激(iTBS)模式引发皮层调制机制的理解。使用近红外光谱(NIRS),我们在交叉设计中比较了单脉冲TMS(spTMS)诱发的先前被抑制(cTBS后)或兴奋(iTBS后)的左侧初级运动皮层(M1)的皮层血流动力学。使用双样本t检验(P<0.05)以及真实刺激与假刺激之间、cTBS和iTBS后的刺激之间的线性混合模型,比较了刺激后6秒内血流动力学的平均相对变化。与基线相比,仅cTBS后的spTMS导致血容量(BV)显著增加(P = 0.04)。其他血流动力学参数(氧合/脱氧血红蛋白)无显著变化。cTBS后的spTMS比iTBS后的spTMS(P = 0.021)和cTBS后的假刺激(P = 0.009)诱导的BV增加更大。iTBS后真实刺激与假刺激之间的BV无显著差异(P = 0.37)。与iTBS相比,更大的血流动力学变化表明cTBS后血管运动反应性增加。此外,cTBS可减少侧向抑制,使cTBS后周围区域得以激活。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a91b/10670137/a283b748d481/brainsci-13-01609-g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验