Kämmerer Peer W, Tavakoli Milad, Gaggl Alexander, Maranzano Massimo
Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Facial Plastic Surgery, University Medical Centre Mainz, Augustusplatz 2, 55131 Mainz, Germany.
Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery and Facial Plastic Surgery, Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust (MFT), Manchester M13 9WL, UK.
J Clin Med. 2023 Nov 13;12(22):7064. doi: 10.3390/jcm12227064.
(1) Background: The current landscape of midface reconstruction is marked by ongoing evolution, with notable advancements in surgical techniques, microvascular procedures, and the implementation of multidisciplinary approaches, all of which have significantly enhanced both functional and aesthetic outcomes. Conventionally, microvascular anastomoses for free flaps in midfacial reconstruction have been executed using cervical vessels. However, this approach necessitates neck access, resulting in extraoral scars and a substantial pedicle length. In light of these considerations, using intraoral anastomoses via the facial vessels emerges as a promising alternative. This retrospective multicentric study aims to provide a comprehensive account of immediate midface reconstruction through intraoral anastomoses. (2) Methods: Between 2020 and 2023, patients were included who underwent intraoral resection of midface/orbit segments (Brown Classes I-VI) as a result of malignant diseases. In all cases, immediate reconstruction was accomplished by utilizing the facial vessels through an intraoral approach. Outcome criteria were identification of vessels, parotid duct or facial nerve damage, success of vascular anastomoses, and flap survival. (3) Results: A total of 117 patients with 132 flaps (91 osseous and 41 cutaneous) were included. The intraoral preparation of facial vessels was successfully completed in less than 1 h, and no complications related to the dissection or anastomoses were observed. In two cases, the vessel diameter was insufficient to facilitate anastomoses, necessitating adopting an extraoral approach. During a follow-up period of 48 months, two osseous flaps were lost, accounting for a 1.5% loss rate out of 132 flaps used. Additionally, 3 flaps experienced partial loss, including a skin island of a scapula, the border zone of a femur, and a rectus flap, resulting in a 2.3% partial loss rate out of 130 flaps utilized. (4) Conclusions: This case series underscores the feasibility of employing intraoral anastomoses for immediate complex midface reconstruction following oncological resection. This approach is particularly advantageous for flaps with shorter pedicles, as it helps mitigate external scarring and minimizes the risk of facial nerve injury.
(1)背景:目前面中部重建领域正在不断发展,手术技术、微血管手术以及多学科方法的应用都取得了显著进展,这些都极大地改善了功能和美学效果。传统上,面中部重建中游离皮瓣的微血管吻合是使用颈部血管进行的。然而,这种方法需要进入颈部,会导致口外瘢痕和较长的蒂长度。鉴于这些考虑因素,通过面部血管进行口内吻合成为一种有前景的替代方法。这项回顾性多中心研究旨在全面阐述通过口内吻合进行即刻面中部重建的情况。(2)方法:2020年至2023年期间,纳入因恶性疾病接受面中部/眼眶段口内切除(布朗分类I - VI级)的患者。在所有病例中,通过口内入路利用面部血管完成即刻重建。结果标准包括血管识别、腮腺导管或面神经损伤、血管吻合成功以及皮瓣存活情况。(3)结果:共纳入117例患者,使用了132个皮瓣(91个骨瓣和41个皮瓣)。面部血管的口内准备在不到1小时内成功完成,未观察到与解剖或吻合相关的并发症。有两例患者血管直径不足以进行吻合,因此需要采用口外入路。在48个月的随访期内,有两个骨瓣丢失,占所使用的132个皮瓣的1.5%丢失率。此外,3个皮瓣部分丢失,包括一个肩胛皮岛、一个股骨边缘区域和一个腹直肌皮瓣,在所使用的130个皮瓣中导致2.3%的部分丢失率。(4)结论:本病例系列强调了在肿瘤切除后采用口内吻合进行即刻复杂面中部重建的可行性。这种方法对于蒂较短的皮瓣特别有利,因为它有助于减轻外部瘢痕形成并将面神经损伤风险降至最低。