Riddick Stuart N, Mbua Mercy, Riddick John C, Houlihan Cade, Hodshire Anna L, Zimmerle Daniel J
Energy Institute, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO 80524, USA.
Independent Researcher, Lockerbie DG11 2DU, Scotland, UK.
Sensors (Basel). 2023 Nov 17;23(22):9246. doi: 10.3390/s23229246.
The recent interest in measuring methane (CH) emissions from abandoned oil and gas wells has resulted in five methods being typically used. In line with the US Federal Orphaned Wells Program's (FOWP) guidelines and the American Carbon Registry's (ACR) protocols, quantification methods must be able to measure minimum emissions of 1 g of CH h to within ±20%. To investigate if the methods meet the required standard, dynamic chambers, a Hi-Flow (HF) sampler, and a Gaussian plume (GP)-based approach were all used to quantify a controlled emission (; g h) of 1 g of CH h. After triplicate experiments, the average accuracy (; %) and the upper (; %) and lower (; %) uncertainty bounds of all methods were calculated. Two dynamic chambers were used, one following the ACR guidelines, and a second "mobile" chamber made from lightweight materials that could be constructed around a source of emission on a well head. The average emission calculated from the measurements made using the dynamic chamber ( = 1.01 g CH h, = +0.9%), the mobile chamber ( = 0.99 g CH h, = -1.4%), the GP approach ( = 0.97 g CH h, = -2.6%), and the HF sampler ( = 1.02 g CH h, = +2.2%) were all within ±3% of 1 g of CH h and met the requirements of the FOWP and ACR protocols. The results also suggest that the individual measurements made using the dynamic chamber can quantify emissions of 1 g of CH h to within ±6% irrespective of the design (material, number of parts, geometrical shape, and hose length), and changes to the construction or material specifications as defined via ACR make no discernible difference to the quantification uncertainty. Our tests show that a collapsible chamber can be easily constructed around the emission source on an abandoned well and be used to quantify emissions from abandoned wells in remote areas. To our knowledge, this is the first time that methods for measuring the CH emissions of 1 g of CH h have been quantitively assessed against a known reference source and against each other.
近期,人们对测量废弃油气井的甲烷(CH)排放量兴趣浓厚,通常采用五种方法。根据美国联邦 orphaned Wells Program(FOWP)指南和美国碳注册处(ACR)的协议,量化方法必须能够测量最低排放量为 1 克 CH/小时,误差在±20%以内。为了研究这些方法是否符合要求的标准,使用了动态箱、高流量(HF)采样器和基于高斯羽流(GP)的方法来量化 1 克 CH/小时的受控排放量(;克/小时)。经过三次重复实验,计算了所有方法的平均准确度(;%)以及上限(;%)和下限(;%)不确定度范围。使用了两个动态箱,一个遵循 ACR 指南,另一个是由轻质材料制成的“移动”箱,可以围绕井口的排放源构建。使用动态箱( = 1.01 克 CH/小时, = +0.9%)、移动箱( = 0.99 克 CH/小时, = -1.4%)、GP 方法( = 0.97 克 CH/小时, = -2.6%)和 HF 采样器( = 1.02 克 CH/小时, = +2.2%)测量得到的平均排放量均在 1 克 CH/小时的±3%以内,符合 FOWP 和 ACR 协议的要求。结果还表明,无论设计(材料、部件数量、几何形状和软管长度)如何,使用动态箱进行的单独测量都可以将 1 克 CH/小时的排放量量化在±6%以内,并且按照 ACR 定义对结构或材料规格进行的更改对量化不确定度没有明显影响。我们的测试表明,可以在废弃井上围绕排放源轻松构建一个可折叠箱,并用于量化偏远地区废弃井的排放量。据我们所知,这是首次针对已知参考源并相互之间对测量 1 克 CH/小时的 CH 排放量的方法进行定量评估。