Department of Urology, Hospital Israelita Albert Einstein, São Paulo, Brazil.
Department of Urology, Hospital Beneficencia Portuguesa de Sao Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.
Neurourol Urodyn. 2024 Jan;43(1):126-143. doi: 10.1002/nau.25336. Epub 2023 Nov 27.
Men with detrusor underactivity (DUA) and concomitant bladder outlet obstruction (BOO) due to benign prostatic enlargement (BPE) may present poorer functional outcomes after surgical desobstruction. This study aimed to evaluate the safety and efficacy of BPE surgery in men with DUA compared with those with normal detrusor contractility (NC).
This review was performed according to the 2020 PRISMA framework. A comprehensive literature search was performed until May 7, 2023, using MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Cochrane Database. No date limits were imposed. Only comparative studies were accepted. The primary endpoint was to assess if there was any difference in short- and long-term functional outcomes after BPE surgery in men with DUA and NC. The secondary endpoint was to evaluate the differences in perioperative outcomes and postoperative complications between the two groups. Meta-analysis was performed using Review Manager (RevMan) software.
There were 5 prospective nonrandomized studies and 12 retrospective studies, including 1701 DUA and 1993 NC patients. Regarding surgical procedures, there were eight TURP (transurethral resection of the prostate) studies, four GreenLight PVP (photoselective vaporization of the prostate) studies, two HoLEP (Holmium laser enucleation of the prostate) studies, one GreenLight PVP/HoLEP study, one Holmium laser incision of the prostate study, and one study did not report the type of surgery. We did not find a statistically significant difference between the two groups in terms of perioperative outcomes, including postoperative catheterization time, hospitalization time, urinary retention, need to recatheterization, transfusion rate, or urinary tract infections. Also, we found no significant differences in long-term complications, such as bladder neck stenosis or urethral stenosis. Posttreatment bladder recatheterization and retreatment rate for BPE regrowth could not be evaluated properly, because only one study reported these findings. When we analyzed functional outcomes at 3 months, those with NC had lower International Prostatic Symptom Score (IPSS), lower quality-of-life (QoL) score, better maximum flow rate (Qmax), and lower post-voiding residual (PVR) of urine. These results were maintained at 6 months postoperatively, with exception of PVR that showed no difference. However, at 12 and more than 12 months the functional outcomes became similar regarding IPSS and QoL. There were few data about Qmax and PVR at longer follow-up.
In this meta-analysis, data suggest that BOO surgical treatment in patients with concomitant BPE and DUA appears to be safe. Despite patients with DUA may present worse functional outcomes in the short postoperative term compared with the NC population, IPSS and QoL scores become comparable again after a longer follow-up period after surgery.
患有逼尿肌活动低下(DUA)和良性前列腺增生(BPE)引起的膀胱出口梗阻(BOO)的男性,在接受手术解除梗阻后可能会出现较差的功能结果。本研究旨在评估与正常逼尿肌收缩力(NC)相比,BPE 手术对 DUA 男性的安全性和有效性。
本综述按照 2020 年 PRISMA 框架进行。使用 MEDLINE、EMBASE 和 Cochrane 数据库进行了全面的文献检索,检索时间截至 2023 年 5 月 7 日,没有设置日期限制。只接受了比较研究。主要终点是评估 DUA 和 NC 男性在 BPE 手术后短期和长期功能结果是否存在差异。次要终点是评估两组围手术期结果和术后并发症的差异。使用 Review Manager(RevMan)软件进行荟萃分析。
共有 5 项前瞻性非随机研究和 12 项回顾性研究,包括 1701 例 DUA 和 1993 例 NC 患者。关于手术方式,有 8 项 TURP(经尿道前列腺切除术)研究、4 项 GreenLight PVP(前列腺绿激光汽化术)研究、2 项 HoLEP(钬激光前列腺剜除术)研究、1 项 GreenLight PVP/HoLEP 研究、1 项前列腺激光切开术研究,以及 1 项研究未报告手术类型。我们没有发现两组在围手术期结果方面存在统计学差异,包括术后导尿时间、住院时间、尿潴留、需要再次导尿、输血率或尿路感染。此外,我们也没有发现长期并发症(如膀胱颈狭窄或尿道狭窄)有显著差异。由于只有一项研究报告了这些发现,因此无法正确评估治疗后膀胱再插管和 BPE 复发的再治疗率。当我们分析 3 个月时的功能结果时,NC 组的国际前列腺症状评分(IPSS)更低,生活质量(QoL)评分更低,最大尿流率(Qmax)更高,尿后残余量(PVR)更低。这些结果在术后 6 个月时仍然存在,除了 PVR 没有差异。然而,在 12 个月及以上的随访中,IPSS 和 QoL 的功能结果变得相似。关于 Qmax 和 PVR 的长期随访数据较少。
在这项荟萃分析中,数据表明,在同时患有 BPE 和 DUA 的患者中,BOO 手术治疗似乎是安全的。尽管与 NC 人群相比,DUA 患者在术后短期可能会出现更差的功能结果,但在手术后较长的随访期后,IPSS 和 QoL 评分再次变得相似。