Sorbonne Université, INSERM, Centre d'Immunologie et des Maladies Infectieuses (Cimi-Paris), Paris, France.
Janssen Pharmaceutica, Beerse, Belgium.
PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2023 Nov 27;17(11):e0011379. doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0011379. eCollection 2023 Nov.
Bedaquiline (BDQ), by targeting the electron transport chain and having a long half-life, is a good candidate to simplify leprosy treatment. Our objectives were to (i) determine the minimal effective dose (MED) of BDQ administered orally, (ii) evaluate the benefit of combining two inhibitors of the respiratory chain, BDQ administered orally and clofazimine (CFZ)) and (iii) evaluate the benefit of an intramuscular injectable long-acting formulation of BDQ (intramuscular BDQ, BDQ-LA IM), in a murine model of leprosy.
METHODOLOGY/PRINCIPAL FINDINGS: To determine the MED of BDQ administered orally and the benefit of adding CFZ, 100 four-week-old female nude mice were inoculated in the footpads with 5x103 bacilli of M. leprae strain THAI53. Mice were randomly allocated into: 1 untreated group, 5 groups treated with BDQ administered orally (0.10 to 25 mg/kg), 3 groups treated with CFZ 20 mg/kg alone or combined with BDQ administered orally 0.10 or 0.33 mg/kg, and 1 group treated with rifampicin (RIF) 10 mg/kg. Mice were treated 5 days a week during 24 weeks. To evaluate the benefit of the BDQ-LA IM, 340 four-week-old female swiss mice were inoculated in the footpads with 5x103 to 5x101 bacilli (or 5x100 for the untreated control group) of M. leprae strain THAI53. Mice were randomly allocated into the following 11 groups treated with a single dose (SD) or 3 doses (3D) 24h after the inoculation: 1 untreated group, 2 treated with RIF 10 mg/kg SD or 3D, 8 treated with BDQ administered orally or BDQ-LA IM 2 or 20 mg/kg, SD or 3D. Twelve months later, mice were sacrificed and M. leprae bacilli enumerated in the footpad. All the footpads became negative with BDQ at 3.3 mg/kg. The MED of BDQ administered orally against M. leprae in this model is therefore 3.3 mg/kg. The combination of CFZ and BDQ 10-fold lower than this MED did not significantly increase the bactericidal activity of CFZ. The BDQ-LA IM displayed similar or lower bactericidal activity than the BDQ administered orally.
We demonstrated that the MED of BDQ administered orally against M. leprae was 3.3 mg/kg in mice and BDQ did not add significantly to the efficacy of CFZ at the doses tested. BDQ-LA IM was similar or less active than BDQ administered orally at equivalent dosing and frequency but should be tested at higher dosing in order to reach equivalent exposure in further experiments.
贝达喹啉(BDQ)通过靶向电子传递链并具有较长的半衰期,是简化麻风病治疗的理想选择。我们的目标是:(i)确定口服贝达喹啉的最小有效剂量(MED),(ii)评估联合两种呼吸链抑制剂,即口服贝达喹啉和氯法齐明(CFZ)的益处,以及(iii)评估肌肉内注射长效贝达喹啉(肌肉内贝达喹啉,BDQ-LA IM)的益处,在麻风病的小鼠模型中。
方法/主要发现:为了确定口服贝达喹啉的 MED 和添加 CFZ 的益处,将 100 只 4 周龄雌性裸鼠接种 5x103 株 M. leprae 菌株 THAI53 的足底。将小鼠随机分配到以下组:1 个未治疗组,5 个口服贝达喹啉治疗组(0.10 至 25mg/kg),3 个 CFZ 20mg/kg 单独或联合口服贝达喹啉 0.10 或 0.33mg/kg 治疗组,1 个利福平(RIF)10mg/kg 治疗组。每周治疗 5 天,共 24 周。为了评估 BDQ-LA IM 的益处,将 340 只 4 周龄雌性瑞士小鼠接种 5x103 至 5x101 株 M. leprae 菌株 THAI53(未治疗对照组为 5x100)的足底。将小鼠随机分配到以下 11 个接受单次剂量(SD)或 3 次剂量(3D)治疗的组:1 个未治疗组,2 个接受 RIF 10mg/kg SD 或 3D 治疗,8 个接受口服贝达喹啉或 BDQ-LA IM 2 或 20mg/kg,SD 或 3D 治疗。12 个月后,处死小鼠并在足底计数麻风分枝杆菌。所有的足底在 3.3mg/kg 的 BDQ 下都变成了阴性。因此,在该模型中,口服贝达喹啉治疗麻风分枝杆菌的 MED 为 3.3mg/kg。CFZ 与 BDQ 的组合,其浓度比 MED 低 10 倍,并没有显著增加 CFZ 的杀菌活性。BDQ-LA IM 显示出与口服贝达喹啉相似或更低的杀菌活性。
我们证明了口服贝达喹啉治疗小鼠麻风分枝杆菌的 MED 为 3.3mg/kg,并且在测试剂量下,BDQ 并没有显著增加 CFZ 的疗效。BDQ-LA IM 在等效剂量和频率下与口服贝达喹啉的活性相似或更低,但应在更高剂量下进行测试,以在进一步的实验中达到等效暴露。