Al-Sarayfi D, Brink M, Chamuleau M E D, Brouwer R, van Rijn R S, Issa D, Deenik W, Huls G, Mous R, Vermaat J S P, Diepstra A, Zijlstra J M, van Meerten T, Nijland M
Department of Hematology, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.
Department of Research and Development, Netherlands Comprehensive Cancer Organisation (IKNL), Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Am J Hematol. 2024 Feb;99(2):216-222. doi: 10.1002/ajh.27151. Epub 2023 Nov 28.
For elderly frail patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL), an attenuated chemo-immunotherapy strategy of rituximab, cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine and prednisolone (R-miniCHOP) was introduced as a treatment option as from 2014 onward in the Netherlands. Although R-miniCHOP is more tolerable, reduction of chemotherapy could negatively affect survival compared to R-CHOP. The aim of this analysis was to assess survival of patients treated with R-miniCHOP compared to R-CHOP. DLBCL patients ≥65 years, newly diagnosed in 2014-2020, who received ≥1 cycle of R-miniCHOP or R-CHOP were identified in the Netherlands Cancer Registry, with survival follow-up through 2022. Patients were propensity-score-matched for baseline characteristics. Main endpoints were progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and relative survival (RS). The use of R-miniCHOP in DLBCL increased from 2% in 2014 to 15% in 2020. In total, 384 patients treated with R-miniCHOP and 384 patients treated with R-CHOP were included for comparison (median age; 81 years, stage 3-4; 68%). The median number of R-(mini)CHOP cycles was 6 (range, 1-8). The 2-year PFS, OS and RS were inferior for patients treated with R-miniCHOP compared to R-CHOP (PFS 51% vs. 68%, p < .01; OS 60% vs. 75%, p < .01; RS 69% vs. 86%, p < .01). In multivariable analysis, patients treated with R-miniCHOP had higher risk of all-cause mortality compared to patients treated with R-CHOP (HR 1.73; 95%CI, 1.39-2.17). R-miniCHOP is effective for most elderly patients. Although survival is inferior compared to R-CHOP, the use of R-miniCHOP as initial treatment is increasing. Therefore, fitness needs to be carefully weighed in treatment selection.
自2014年起,荷兰引入了一种针对弥漫性大B细胞淋巴瘤(DLBCL)老年体弱患者的减毒化疗免疫治疗策略,即利妥昔单抗、环磷酰胺、阿霉素、长春新碱和泼尼松龙(R-miniCHOP)作为一种治疗选择。尽管R-miniCHOP耐受性更好,但与R-CHOP相比,化疗剂量的减少可能会对生存率产生负面影响。本分析的目的是评估接受R-miniCHOP治疗的患者与接受R-CHOP治疗的患者的生存率。在荷兰癌症登记处确定了2014年至2020年新诊断的≥65岁的DLBCL患者,这些患者接受了≥1个周期的R-miniCHOP或R-CHOP治疗,并随访至2022年。对患者的基线特征进行倾向评分匹配。主要终点是无进展生存期(PFS)、总生存期(OS)和相对生存期(RS)。DLBCL患者中R-miniCHOP的使用比例从2014年的2%增加到2020年的15%。总共纳入384例接受R-miniCHOP治疗的患者和384例接受R-CHOP治疗的患者进行比较(中位年龄81岁,3-4期68%)。R-(mini)CHOP周期的中位数为6个(范围1-8个)。与接受R-CHOP治疗的患者相比,接受R-miniCHOP治疗的患者的2年PFS、OS和RS较差(PFS 51%对68%,p<0.01;OS 60%对75%,p<0.01;RS 69%对86%,p<0.01)。在多变量分析中,与接受R-CHOP治疗的患者相比,接受R-miniCHOP治疗的患者全因死亡风险更高(HR 1.73;95%CI,1.39-2.17)。R-miniCHOP对大多数老年患者有效。尽管生存率低于R-CHOP,但R-miniCHOP作为初始治疗的使用正在增加。因此,在治疗选择中需要仔细权衡身体状况。