Barreto Leticia, Ferreira Deborah Cristina Goulart, Corrente José Eduardo, Soares Carlos Segundo Paiva, Oliveira Cristiano Claudino, Terra Simone Antunes, Moriguchi Sonia Marta, Koga Katia Hiromoto, Tagliarini José Vicente, da Silva Mazeto Gláucia Maria Ferreira
Internal Medicine Department, Botucatu Medical School, Sao Paulo State University - Unesp, Botucatu, Brazil.
Biosciences Institute, Bioestatistics Department - Unesp, Botucatu, Brazil.
Hormones (Athens). 2024 Mar;23(1):97-106. doi: 10.1007/s42000-023-00503-0. Epub 2023 Nov 28.
It is not clear whether response to initial treatment in papillary thyroid carcinoma (PTC) patients is best evaluated by measuring thyroglobulin (Tg) in the presence of levothyroxine (BTg) or when stimulated by elevated TSH (STg). The aim of this study was to evaluate whether response to therapy 1 year after initial treatment changes with the use of STg in relation to BTg in PTC patients treated with total thyroidectomy (TT) and radioiodine (I), and, if observed, to assess which response is better associated with clinical course.
This is a retrospective study of 148 PTC patients submitted to TT and I. We analyzed the response to therapy (excellent, biochemical incomplete, or indeterminate) at 1 year after initial treatment, using BTg or STg, and compared which method was better associated with "excellent response at final evaluation."
Twenty-eight patients (20.4%) presented change in response to therapy, with 17 of these (60.7%) presenting a worse response. Response using STg was 1.6 times better associated with proposed outcome [odds ratio (OR) = 4.61; confidence interval 95% (IC95%): 2.13-9.98] than with BTg (OR = 2.84; IC95%: 1.33-6.06).
Response to therapy at 1 year using STg was altered in approximately 20% of cases and therefore proved to be a better predictor of excellent response in the last evaluation.
目前尚不清楚,对于甲状腺乳头状癌(PTC)患者,在左甲状腺素(BTg)存在的情况下测量甲状腺球蛋白(Tg),还是在促甲状腺激素(TSH)升高刺激时测量甲状腺球蛋白(STg),能更好地评估其对初始治疗的反应。本研究的目的是评估在接受全甲状腺切除术(TT)和放射性碘(I)治疗的PTC患者中,与使用BTg相比,使用STg评估初始治疗1年后的治疗反应是否会发生变化,以及如果观察到变化,评估哪种反应与临床病程的相关性更好。
这是一项对148例接受TT和I治疗的PTC患者的回顾性研究。我们使用BTg或STg分析了初始治疗1年后的治疗反应(优秀、生化不完全或不确定),并比较了哪种方法与“最终评估时的优秀反应”相关性更好。
28例患者(20.4%)出现治疗反应变化,其中17例(60.7%)反应变差。与BTg相比,使用STg评估的反应与预期结果的相关性高1.6倍[优势比(OR)=4.61;95%置信区间(IC95%):2.13 - 9.98],而BTg的优势比为(OR)=2.84;IC95%:1.33 - 6.06。
使用STg评估初始治疗1年后的治疗反应,约20%的病例出现变化,因此在最终评估中,STg被证明是优秀反应的更好预测指标。