Memorial Care Heart and Vascular Institute, Long Beach Medical Center, Long Beach, California.
Los Angeles County EMS Agency, Sante Fe Springs, California; David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles, California; Department of Emergency Medicine, Harbor UCLA Medical Center, Torrance, California.
Am J Cardiol. 2024 Feb 15;213:93-98. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2023.11.035. Epub 2023 Nov 26.
Previous studies have documented longer treatment times and worse outcomes for patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) who underwent primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) during the COVID-19 pandemic. The objective of the present study was to evaluate the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on treatment times and outcomes for patients with STEMI who underwent primary PCI within a regional system of care. This was a retrospective study using data from the Los Angeles County Emergency Medical Services Agency. Data on the emergency medical service activations were abstracted for patients with STEMI from March 19, 2020 to January 31, 2021, during the COVID-19 pandemic and for the same interval the previous year. All adult patients (≥18 years) with STEMI who underwent emergent coronary angiography were included. The primary end point was the first medical contact (FMC) to device time. The secondary end points included treatment time intervals, vascular complications, need for emergent coronary artery bypass surgery, length of hospital stay, and in-hospital mortality. During the study period, 3,017 patients underwent coronary angiography for STEMI, 1,893 patients pre-COVID-19 and 1,124 patients during COVID-19 (40% lower). A total of 2,334 patients (77%) underwent PCI. During the COVID-19 period, rates of PCI were significantly lower compared with the control period (75.1% vs 78.7%, p = 0.02). FMC to device time was shorter during the COVID-19 period compared with the control period (median 77.0 vs 81.0 minutes, p = 0.004). For patients with STEMI complicated by out-of-hospital cardiac arrest, FMC to device time was similar during the COVID-19 period compared with the control period (median 95.0 [33.0] vs 100.0 [40.0] minutes, p = 0.34). Vascular complications, the need for emergent bypass surgery, length of hospital stay, and in-hospital mortality were similar between the periods. In conclusion, in this large regional system of care, we found a relatively small but significant decrease in treatment times, yet overall, similar clinical outcomes for patients with STEMI who underwent primary PCI and were treated during the COVID-19 period compared with a control period. These findings suggest that mature cardiac systems of care were able to maintain efficient care despite the challenges of the COVID-19 pandemic.
先前的研究记录表明,在 COVID-19 大流行期间接受直接经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI)的 ST 段抬高型心肌梗死(STEMI)患者的治疗时间更长,结局更差。本研究的目的是评估 COVID-19 大流行对在区域性医疗服务系统内接受直接 PCI 的 STEMI 患者的治疗时间和结局的影响。这是一项回顾性研究,使用了洛杉矶县紧急医疗服务局的数据。从 2020 年 3 月 19 日至 2021 年 1 月 31 日期间,COVID-19 大流行期间,从急诊医疗服务激活数据中提取了 STEMI 患者的数据,以及前一年同期的数据。所有接受紧急冠状动脉造影的成年 STEMI 患者(≥18 岁)均纳入本研究。主要终点是首次医疗接触(FMC)至器械时间。次要终点包括治疗时间间隔、血管并发症、紧急冠状动脉旁路移植术的需求、住院时间和院内死亡率。在研究期间,有 3017 名患者因 STEMI 接受了冠状动脉造影检查,1893 名患者在 COVID-19 之前,1124 名患者在 COVID-19 期间(减少了 40%)。共有 2334 名患者(77%)接受了 PCI。在 COVID-19 期间,与对照组相比,PCI 率显著降低(75.1%比 78.7%,p=0.02)。与对照组相比,COVID-19 期间 FMC 至器械时间更短(中位数 77.0 分钟比 81.0 分钟,p=0.004)。对于 STEMI 合并院外心脏骤停的患者,COVID-19 期间与对照组相比,FMC 至器械时间相似(中位数 95.0 [33.0] 分钟比 100.0 [40.0] 分钟,p=0.34)。血管并发症、紧急旁路手术的需求、住院时间和院内死亡率在两个时期相似。总之,在这个大型区域性医疗服务系统中,我们发现治疗时间相对较小但显著缩短,然而,与对照组相比,在 COVID-19 期间接受直接 PCI 治疗的 STEMI 患者的总体临床结局相似。这些发现表明,尽管面临 COVID-19 大流行的挑战,但成熟的心脏医疗服务系统仍能够保持高效的护理。