NJSC "National Research Cardiac Surgery Center", Astana, Kazakhstan.
NJSC "National Research Cardiac Surgery Center", Astana, Kazakhstan.
J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth. 2024 Jan;38(1):80-85. doi: 10.1053/j.jvca.2023.10.031. Epub 2023 Oct 27.
Cardiac surgery with cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) is associated with hypofibrinogenemia and severe bleeding requiring transfusion. Guidelines recommend cryoprecipitate or fibrinogen concentrate (FC) for the treatment of acquired hypofibrinogenemia. This study compared cryoprecipitate and FC for the correction of acquired hypofibrinogenemia and the associated costs.
A single-center, prospective, randomized study evaluating patients with hypofibrinogenemia after cardiac surgery. The primary endpoint was direct treatment cost. Secondary endpoints included the change in fibrinogen level after FC and/or cryoprecipitate dosing.
A single-center study in Astana, Kazakhstan.
Participants who underwent CPB from 2021 to 2022 and developed clinically significant bleeding and hypofibrinogenemia.
Patients were randomized to receive cryoprecipitate or FC.
Eighty-eight adult patients with acquired hypofibrinogenemia (<2.0 g/L) after CPB were randomized to receive cryoprecipitate (N = 40) or FC (N = 48), with similar demographics between groups. Overall, mean ± SD 9.33 ± 0.94 units (range, 8-10) cryoprecipitate or 1.40 ± 0.49 g (1-2) FC was administered to the 2 groups. From before administration to 24 hours after, mean plasma fibrinogen increased by a mean ± SD of 125 ± 65 and 96 ± 65 mg/dL in the cryoprecipitate and FC groups, respectively. At 48 hours after administration, there was no significant difference in fibrinogen levels between groups. The mean direct cost of treatment with FC was significantly lower than with cryoprecipitate (p < 0.0001): $1,505.06 ± $152.40 and $631.75 ± $223.67 per patient for cryoprecipitate and FC, respectively.
Analysis of plasma fibrinogen concentration showed that cryoprecipitate and FC had comparable effectiveness. However, FC is advantageous over cryoprecipitate due to its ease of handling, lower cost, and high purity.
体外循环心脏手术后常伴有低纤维蛋白原血症和严重出血需要输血。指南建议使用冷沉淀或纤维蛋白原浓缩物(FC)治疗获得性低纤维蛋白原血症。本研究比较了冷沉淀和 FC 纠正获得性低纤维蛋白原血症的效果和相关成本。
这是一项单中心、前瞻性、随机研究,评估心脏手术后低纤维蛋白原血症患者。主要终点是直接治疗费用。次要终点包括 FC 和/或冷沉淀给药后纤维蛋白原水平的变化。
哈萨克斯坦阿斯塔纳的一个单中心研究。
2021 年至 2022 年接受体外循环并出现临床显著出血和低纤维蛋白原血症的成人患者。
患者随机接受冷沉淀或 FC 治疗。
88 例体外循环后获得性低纤维蛋白原血症(<2.0 g/L)的成年患者被随机分为冷沉淀组(N=40)或 FC 组(N=48),两组之间的人口统计学特征相似。总体而言,两组分别给予 9.33±0.94 单位(8-10 单位)冷沉淀或 1.40±0.49 g(1-2 g)FC。从给药前到 24 小时,冷沉淀组和 FC 组的血浆纤维蛋白原分别平均增加 125±65 和 96±65 mg/dL。给药后 48 小时,两组间纤维蛋白原水平无显著差异。FC 的直接治疗费用明显低于冷沉淀(p<0.0001):冷沉淀和 FC 组的每位患者分别为 631.75±223.67 美元和 1505.06±152.40 美元。
血浆纤维蛋白原浓度分析表明,冷沉淀和 FC 的疗效相当。然而,FC 比冷沉淀具有优势,因为它易于处理、成本更低且纯度更高。