Suppr超能文献

由初级保健护士主导的复杂慢性病患者家庭健康监测和教育计划的效果。

Effectiveness of a home health monitoring and education program for complex chronic patients, led by primary care nurses.

机构信息

School of Doctorate, University of Valencia Saint Vincent Martyr, Valencia, Spain.

Department of Health La Ribera, Valencia, Spain.

出版信息

Front Public Health. 2023 Nov 9;11:1281980. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2023.1281980. eCollection 2023.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The challenge of chronicity has led developed countries to design strategies to respond to the new needs of complex chronic patients (CCP). There is evidence supporting better beneficial effects and more efficient care for CCP when home-base care programs are provided by Primary Health Care professionals. The main objective of the present study was to assess the effectiveness of a nursing intervention program of home visits for CCP analyzing the use of health services in terms of hospital admissions, emergency care unit visits, and mortality rate.

METHODS

A quasi-experimental study was designed to retrospectively evaluate the effectiveness of a 3-year proactive, individualized nursing intervention in improving health outcomes measured by health service utilization (hospitalization, emergency care, and nursing home visits) in these patients. Of the 344 complex chronic patients participating in the study, 93 were assigned to the intervention group (IG) and 251 to the control group (CG).

RESULTS

Along the period of study, the number of home visits in the IG almost tripled in relation to the CG (14.29 ± 4.49 vs. 4.17 ± 2.68,  < 0.001). Admissions in the first and second year of the study period were lower in the intervention group  = 0.002 and  < 0.001 respectively. All the participants in the control group were admitted at least once during the study period. In contrast, 29.0% of the participants in the intervention group never had a hospital admission during the 3-years study period. The number of ED visits to the emergency department was significantly lower in the IG during the 3 years of the study periods. The cumulative number of emergency visits in the IG was half that in the CG (5.66 ± 4. vs. 11.11 ± 4.45,  < 0.001, Cohen'd,1.53). A total of 35.5% of the participants in the intervention group visited the emergency department on three or fewer occasions compared to 98% of the subjects in the control group who visited the emergency department on more than six occasions ( < 0.001). The 3-year overall mortality rate was 23.5% in the control group and 21.6% in the nursing home visit program. These differences were not statistically significant.

CONCLUSION

The program demonstrated its effectiveness in reduction of hospital admissions and visits to the emergency department. The program had no impact on mortality rate. This program of home visits reinforces the role of primary care nurses in advanced competencies in chronicity.

摘要

背景

慢性病的挑战促使发达国家制定策略,以应对复杂慢性病患者(CCP)的新需求。有证据表明,当初级保健专业人员提供家庭为基础的护理计划时,CCP 的有益效果更好,护理更高效。本研究的主要目的是评估家庭访问护理干预计划对复杂慢性病患者的有效性,分析住院、急诊护理单元就诊和死亡率方面的卫生服务利用情况。

方法

设计了一项准实验研究,以回顾性评估为期 3 年的积极、个体化护理干预对改善健康结果的有效性,健康服务利用(住院、急诊和护理院就诊)来衡量这些患者的健康状况。在参与研究的 344 名复杂慢性病患者中,93 名被分配到干预组(IG),251 名被分配到对照组(CG)。

结果

在研究期间,IG 的家访次数几乎是 CG 的三倍(14.29 ± 4.49 对 4.17 ± 2.68, < 0.001)。在研究的第一年和第二年,干预组的入院人数分别降低( = 0.002 和  < 0.001)。对照组的所有参与者在研究期间都至少入院一次。相比之下,IG 组的 29.0%的参与者在 3 年的研究期间从未住院。在研究的 3 年期间,IG 到急诊部就诊的急诊就诊次数明显减少。IG 的急诊就诊次数累积数是 CG 的一半(5.66 ± 4. 对 11.11 ± 4.45, < 0.001,Cohen'd,1.53)。干预组有 35.5%的参与者就诊次数为 3 次或更少,而对照组有 98%的参与者就诊次数超过 6 次( < 0.001)。对照组的 3 年总死亡率为 23.5%,护理院就诊组为 21.6%。这些差异无统计学意义。

结论

该方案在减少住院和急诊就诊方面显示出其有效性。该方案对死亡率没有影响。家庭访问计划强化了初级保健护士在慢性病方面的高级能力。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4360/10665850/9f93589aa970/fpubh-11-1281980-g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验