Tillotson J L, Gorder D D, DuChene A G, Grambsch P V, Wenz J
Control Clin Trials. 1986 Sep;7(3 Suppl):66S-90S. doi: 10.1016/0197-2456(86)90160-1.
One of the principal objectives of the MRFIT was to teach and motivate participants assigned to the SI group to adhere to a fat-controlled dietary regimen over the course of the trial. The magnitude of the trial (with more than 12,000 participants, half of them assigned to the SI protocol, to be followed for at least 6 years in 22 separate centers) presented new challenges for maintenance of quality control over a nutrition intervention program. Collection of data to monitor changes in dietary intake over time in SI and UC groups, as well as information to assess dietary adherence levels in SI participants also presented large-scale challenges in maintenance of quality control. The MRFIT formulated many of its initial nutrition intervention and data collection decisions based on experience of the earlier National Diet Heart Study (NDHS). In order to avoid coding 7-day dietary records by local clinic nutritionists (as in NDHS), the trial opted for collection of 24-hour dietary recalls that were coded centrally at the Nutrition Coding Center. It necessitated extra attention to training and certification of clinic nutritionist-interviewers to be certain that NCC coders had sufficiently precise information about all foods entered on dietary recall forms. Since dietary intake data were collected over a time span of approximately 10 years, procedures for updating the food composition database and coding rules were a necessity. Continuing attention to training and monitoring of performance of clinic nutritionist-interviewers also was important. The MRFIT nutrition intervention program was designed with the need for interclinic comparability of intervention techniques in mind. This required not only development of study-wide nutrition intervention materials, but also necessitated ongoing attention to staff training and monitoring procedures in order to ensure intercenter comparability of efforts. The success of the nutrition intervention modality depended upon the continuing efforts of the nutrition counselors not only to achieve dietary adherence but also to monitor levels of dietary adherence over time. The NDHS experience served as a springboard for designing the MRFIT nutrition intervention and data collection procedures. It is hoped that techniques for maintaining and monitoring quality control over the MRFIT nutrition modality as outlined in this chapter may prove useful to future planners.
多重危险因素干预试验(MRFIT)的主要目标之一是在试验过程中教导并激励被分配到特殊干预(SI)组的参与者坚持脂肪控制饮食方案。该试验规模庞大(超过12000名参与者,其中一半被分配到SI方案,在22个独立中心至少随访6年),这给营养干预项目的质量控制维护带来了新挑战。收集数据以监测SI组和常规对照(UC)组随时间变化的饮食摄入量,以及评估SI参与者饮食依从性水平的信息,在质量控制维护方面也带来了大规模挑战。MRFIT基于早期国家饮食与心脏研究(NDHS)的经验做出了许多最初的营养干预和数据收集决策。为了避免当地诊所营养师对7天饮食记录进行编码(如在NDHS中那样),该试验选择收集24小时饮食回顾,并在营养编码中心进行集中编码。这就需要格外关注诊所营养访谈员的培训和认证,以确保营养编码中心的编码人员能够获得关于饮食回顾表上所记录所有食物的足够精确信息。由于饮食摄入量数据是在大约10年的时间跨度内收集的,因此更新食物成分数据库和编码规则的程序是必要的。持续关注诊所营养访谈员的培训和绩效监测也很重要。MRFIT营养干预项目的设计考虑到了不同诊所间干预技术的可比性需求。这不仅需要开发全研究范围的营养干预材料,还需要持续关注工作人员培训和监测程序,以确保各中心工作的可比性。营养干预方式的成功取决于营养顾问的持续努力,不仅要实现饮食依从性,还要长期监测饮食依从性水平。NDHS的经验为设计MRFIT营养干预和数据收集程序提供了跳板。希望本章所概述的维持和监测MRFIT营养方式质量控制的技术对未来的规划者可能有用。