Department of Cardiac Surgery, Smidt Heart Institute, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, Calif.
Department of Cardiology, Smidt Heart Institute, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, Calif.
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2024 Oct;168(4):1035-1044.e17. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2023.12.002. Epub 2023 Dec 6.
Randomized trials of transcatheter versus surgical aortic valve replacements have excluded bicuspid anatomy. We compared 3-year outcomes of transcatheter aortic valve replacement versus surgical aortic valve replacement in patients aged more than 65 years with bicuspid aortic stenosis.
The Centers for Medicare and Medicaid data were used to identify 6450 patients undergoing isolated surgical aortic valve replacement (n = 3771) or transcatheter aortic valve replacement (n = 2679) for bicuspid aortic stenosis (2012-2019). Propensity score matching with 21 baseline characteristics including frailty created 797 pairs.
Unmatched patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve replacement were older than patients undergoing surgical aortic valve replacement (78 vs 70 years), with more comorbidities and frailty (all P < .001). After matching, transcatheter aortic valve replacement was associated with a similar mortality risk compared with surgical aortic valve replacement within the first 6 months (hazard ratio [HR], 1.08, 95% CI, 0.67-1.69) but a higher mortality risk between 6 months and 3 years (HR, 2.16, 95% CI, 1.22-3.83). Additionally, transcatheter aortic valve replacement was associated with a lower risk of heart failure readmissions before 6 months (HR, 0.51, 95% CI, 0.31-0.87) but a higher risk between 6 months and 3 years (HR, 4.78, 95% CI, 2.21-10.36). The 3-year risks of aortic valve reintervention (HR, 1.03, 95% CI, 0.30-3.56) and stroke (HR, 1.21, 95% CI, 0.75-1.96) were similar.
Among matched Medicare beneficiaries undergoing transcatheter aortic valve replacement or surgical aortic valve replacement for bicuspid aortic stenosis, 3-year mortality was higher after transcatheter aortic valve replacement. However, transcatheter aortic valve replacement was associated with a similar risk of mortality and a lower risk of heart failure readmissions during the first 6 months after the intervention. Randomized comparative data are needed to best inform treatment choice.
经导管主动脉瓣置换术与外科主动脉瓣置换术的随机试验排除了二叶式解剖结构。我们比较了年龄超过 65 岁的二叶式主动脉瓣狭窄患者接受经导管主动脉瓣置换术与外科主动脉瓣置换术的 3 年结局。
使用医疗保险和医疗补助数据确定了 6450 例接受单纯外科主动脉瓣置换术(n=3771)或经导管主动脉瓣置换术(n=2679)治疗的二叶式主动脉瓣狭窄患者。采用 21 项基线特征(包括虚弱)的倾向评分匹配,创建了 797 对。
未经匹配的接受经导管主动脉瓣置换术的患者比接受外科主动脉瓣置换术的患者年龄更大(78 岁 vs 70 岁),合并症和虚弱程度更高(均 P<0.001)。匹配后,经导管主动脉瓣置换术在术后 6 个月内与外科主动脉瓣置换术的死亡率风险相似(风险比[HR],1.08,95%CI,0.67-1.69),但在 6 个月至 3 年内死亡率风险更高(HR,2.16,95%CI,1.22-3.83)。此外,经导管主动脉瓣置换术在术后 6 个月前降低心力衰竭再入院风险(HR,0.51,95%CI,0.31-0.87),但在术后 6 个月至 3 年内风险更高(HR,4.78,95%CI,2.21-10.36)。3 年主动脉瓣再介入风险(HR,1.03,95%CI,0.30-3.56)和卒中风险(HR,1.21,95%CI,0.75-1.96)相似。
在接受经导管主动脉瓣置换术或外科主动脉瓣置换术治疗二叶式主动脉瓣狭窄的匹配医疗保险受益人中,经导管主动脉瓣置换术 3 年后死亡率更高。然而,经导管主动脉瓣置换术在术后 6 个月内与死亡率风险相似,心力衰竭再入院风险更低。需要随机比较数据来为最佳治疗选择提供信息。