Giulioni Carlo, Mulawkar Prashant Motiram, Castellani Daniele, De Stefano Virgilio, Nedbal Carlotta, Gadzhiev Nariman, Pirola Giacomo Maria, Law Yu Xi Terence, Wroclawski Marcelo Langer, Keat William Ong Lay, Tiong Ho Yee, Somani Bhaskar Kumar, Galosi Andrea Benedetto, Gauhar Vineet
Urology Unit, Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria delle Marche, Polytechnic University of Marche, 60121 Ancona, Italy.
Department of Urology, Tirthankar Super Speciality Hospital, Akola 444001, India.
Cancers (Basel). 2023 Nov 24;15(23):5560. doi: 10.3390/cancers15235560.
We aimed to analyze the influence of near-infrared fluorescence (NIRF) using indocyanine green (ICG) with standard robot-assisted partial nephrectomy (RAPN) in patients with a kidney tumor (KT).
We performed a literature search on 12 September 2023 through PubMed, EMBASE, and Scopus. The analysis included observational studies that examined the perioperative and long-term outcomes of patients with a KT who underwent RAPN with NIRF.
Overall, eight prospective studies, involving 535 patients, were eligible for this meta-analysis, with 212 participants in the ICG group and 323 in the No ICG group. For warm ischemia time, the ICG group showed a lower duration (weighted Mean difference (WMD) = -2.05, 95% confidence interval (CI) = -3.30--0.80, = 0.011). The postoperative eGFR also favored the ICG group (WMD = 7.67, 95% CI = 2.88-12.46, = 0.002). No difference emerged for the other perioperative outcomes between the two groups. In terms of oncological radicality, the positive surgical margins and tumor recurrence rates were similar among the two groups.
Our meta-analysis showed that NIRF with ICG during RAPN yields a favorable impact on functional outcomes, whereas it exerts no such influence on oncological aspects. Therefore, NIRF should be adopted when preserving nephron function is a paramount concern.
我们旨在分析使用吲哚菁绿(ICG)的近红外荧光(NIRF)在标准机器人辅助部分肾切除术(RAPN)中对肾肿瘤(KT)患者的影响。
我们于2023年9月12日通过PubMed、EMBASE和Scopus进行了文献检索。分析包括观察性研究,这些研究考察了接受NIRF辅助RAPN的KT患者的围手术期和长期结局。
总体而言,八项前瞻性研究,涉及535名患者,符合本荟萃分析的条件,ICG组有212名参与者,非ICG组有323名。对于热缺血时间,ICG组显示出较短的持续时间(加权平均差(WMD)=-2.05,95%置信区间(CI)=-3.30--0.80,P=0.011)。术后估算肾小球滤过率(eGFR)也有利于ICG组(WMD=7.67,95%CI=2.88-12.46,P=0.002)。两组之间的其他围手术期结局没有差异。在肿瘤根治性方面,两组之间的手术切缘阳性率和肿瘤复发率相似。
我们的荟萃分析表明,RAPN期间使用ICG的NIRF对功能结局有有利影响,而对肿瘤学方面没有这种影响。因此,当保护肾单位功能至关重要时,应采用NIRF。