Sengupta G, Mohapatra T M, Sen P C
J Trop Med Hyg. 1986 Dec;89(6):313-7.
The sensitivity and specificity of the enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA), the indirect haemagglutination (IHA) test and the counter-current immuno-electrophoresis test (CIEP) were assessed in the diagnosis of filariasis. Positive reactions were observed in 91% and 86% of cases by ELISA and IHA respectively. CIEP detected only 31.5% of cases. Cross-reaction due to intestinal nematodes was observed in 80% of cases by both ELISA and IHA whereas with CIEP cross-reaction was observed in 10% of cases. The microfilaria count was inversely proportional to the antibody titre among asymptomatic carriers. ELISA was the most sensitive test, followed by IHA and then CIEP. CIEP, though it detected only a small number of cases, was observed to be the most specific.
评估了酶联免疫吸附测定(ELISA)、间接血凝试验(IHA)和对流免疫电泳试验(CIEP)在丝虫病诊断中的敏感性和特异性。ELISA和IHA分别在91%和86%的病例中观察到阳性反应。CIEP仅检测到31.5%的病例。ELISA和IHA在80%的病例中均观察到由肠道线虫引起的交叉反应,而CIEP在10%的病例中观察到交叉反应。在无症状携带者中,微丝蚴计数与抗体滴度呈反比。ELISA是最敏感的检测方法,其次是IHA,然后是CIEP。CIEP虽然仅检测到少数病例,但被认为是最具特异性的。