Suppr超能文献

姑息性放疗后单纯骨转移的短期疼痛控制:一项前瞻性队列研究。

Short-term pain control after palliative radiotherapy for uncomplicated bone metastases: a prospective cohort study.

作者信息

Bianchi Sofia Paola, Faccenda Valeria, Pacifico Pietro, Parma Gaia, Saufi Sara, Ferrario Federica, Belmonte Maria, Sala Luca, De Ponti Elena, Panizza Denis, Arcangeli Stefano

机构信息

School of Medicine and Surgery, University of Milano Bicocca, Milan, Italy.

Radiation Oncology Department, Fondazione IRCCS San Gerardo Dei Tintori, Monza, Italy.

出版信息

Med Oncol. 2023 Dec 11;41(1):13. doi: 10.1007/s12032-023-02238-9.

Abstract

This study aimed at evaluating the efficacy of different radiotherapy (RT) fractionation regimens in managing uncomplicated painful bone metastases (BM) and identifying predictive factors for pain control. Patients with 1 to 4 symptomatic BM from any primary solid tumors and a life expectancy exceeding 3 months were included in the study and received palliative RT, with SBRT restricted in the context of oligometastatic disease or in patients with good prognosis. Pain analysis using the Brief Pain Inventory (BPI) tool was conducted at baseline, 1 and 3 months after RT. Analgesic intake was recorded as morphine-equivalent doses (OME). Pain response was assessed using the International Consensus on Palliative Radiotherapy Endpoint (ICPRE). Multivariate logistic regression analyzed patient-related, tumor-related, and treatment-related factors predicting BM pain control at 3 months post-RT. From Feb 2022 to Feb 2023, 44 patients with 65 symptomatic BM were investigated. Breast (32%) and lung (24%) tumors were the most common primary tumors. Treatment plans included 3DCRT (60%) and VMAT (40%), with a median biological effective dose for tumors (BED) of 29 Gy [14-108]. All patients completed the 3-month follow-up. Pain response rates were 62% at 1 month and 60% at 3 months. Responders had better PS ECOG scores (67%; P = 0.008) and received active systemic therapies (67%: P = 0.036). Non-responders had lower pretreatment BPI (mean: 13.7 vs. 58.2; P = 0.032), with significantly higher values after 1 month (mean: 9.1 vs. 5.3, P = 0.033). Baseline BPI (OR: 1.17; 95% CI: 1.032-1.327; P = 0.014) and BPI at 1 month (OR: 0.83; 95% CI: 0.698-0.976; P = 0.025) were independent predictors of pain response at 3 months. Our findings show that palliative RT ensured short-term pain control in patients with BM, regardless of tumor type and dose-fractionation regimen. A larger sample size and a longer follow-up could potentially identify which patients are likely to benefit most from RT, and which fractionation might be indicated for achieving a durable pain relief. A multidisciplinary approach is paramount to provide a better care to BM patients.

摘要

本研究旨在评估不同放疗分割方案在治疗无并发症的疼痛性骨转移瘤(BM)中的疗效,并确定疼痛控制的预测因素。研究纳入了患有1至4个有症状BM且来自任何原发性实体瘤、预期寿命超过3个月的患者,这些患者接受了姑息性放疗,立体定向体部放疗(SBRT)仅限于寡转移疾病或预后良好的患者。在放疗基线、放疗后1个月和3个月使用简明疼痛评估量表(BPI)工具进行疼痛分析。镇痛药物摄入量记录为吗啡等效剂量(OME)。使用姑息性放疗终点国际共识(ICPRE)评估疼痛反应。多因素逻辑回归分析了与患者、肿瘤和治疗相关的因素,以预测放疗后3个月的BM疼痛控制情况。2022年2月至2023年2月,对44例患有65个有症状BM的患者进行了调查。乳腺癌(32%)和肺癌(24%)是最常见的原发性肿瘤。治疗计划包括三维适形放疗(3DCRT,60%)和容积调强弧形放疗(VMAT,40%),肿瘤的中位生物等效剂量(BED)为29 Gy[14 - 108]。所有患者均完成了3个月的随访。1个月时疼痛缓解率为62%,3个月时为60%。疼痛缓解者的东部肿瘤协作组(ECOG)体能状态评分更好(67%;P = 0.008),并且接受了积极的全身治疗(67%;P = 0.036)。未缓解者放疗前BPI较低(平均值:13.7对58.2;P = 0.032),1个月后显著升高(平均值:9.1对5.3,P = 0.033)。基线BPI(比值比:1.17;95%置信区间:1.032 - 1.327;P = 0.014)和1个月时的BPI(比值比:0.83;95%置信区间:0.698 - 0.976;P = 0.025)是3个月时疼痛反应的独立预测因素。我们的研究结果表明,姑息性放疗可确保BM患者的短期疼痛控制,无论肿瘤类型和剂量分割方案如何。更大的样本量和更长的随访时间可能会确定哪些患者最有可能从放疗中获益,以及哪种分割方式可能有助于实现持久的疼痛缓解。多学科方法对于为BM患者提供更好的护理至关重要。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验