Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Hiroshima Prefectural Hospital, Hiroshima, Japan.
Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Hiroshima University Hospital, Hiroshima, Japan; International Center for Lymphedema, Hiroshima University Hospital, Hiroshima, Japan.
J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2024 Jan;88:390-396. doi: 10.1016/j.bjps.2023.11.035. Epub 2023 Nov 28.
This single-centre retrospective cohort study aimed to clarify the superiority of treatment by comparing the outcomes of lymphaticovenular anastomosis with compression therapy and conservative treatment centred on compression therapy in the early stage of breast cancer-related lymphoedema. Data were collected from all patients treated for breast cancer-related lymphoedema between January 2015 and December 2022. The patients were classified into conservative treatment and surgical treatment groups. The upper extremity lymphoedema index value was calculated, based on five circumference values of the upper extremity and body mass index, to compare the 6-, 12-, 18- and 24-month outcomes between the groups. Of 101 patients with breast cancer-related lymphoedema, 81 (conservative treatment: 52; surgical treatment: 29) were included in the analysis. The therapeutic effect was significantly higher in the surgical treatment group than in the conservative treatment group, when comparing the rate of change in oedema at 6 (-6.6% ± 7.3% vs. 0.9% ± 7.5%; p < 0.001), 12 (-7.3% ± 6.2% vs. 2.9% ± 8.6%; p < 0.001), 18 (-7.6% ± 8.0% vs. 3.9% ± 9.2%; p < 0.001) and 24 (-5.6% ± 6.0% vs. 4.4% ± 10.7%; p < 0.001) months. The incidence of cellulitis increased in the conservative treatment group (from 9.6% to 15.4%), whereas it was suppressed in the surgical treatment group (from 13.8% to 0%). Conservative treatment centred on compression therapy increased oedema over time; however, lymphaticovenular anastomosis with compression therapy effectively reduced oedema.
这项单中心回顾性队列研究旨在通过比较乳腺癌相关淋巴水肿早期淋巴管静脉吻合术与以压迫治疗为中心的保守治疗的结果,明确治疗优势。数据来自 2015 年 1 月至 2022 年 12 月期间所有接受乳腺癌相关淋巴水肿治疗的患者。患者分为保守治疗和手术治疗组。根据上肢和体重指数的五个周长值计算上肢淋巴水肿指数值,以比较两组患者在 6、12、18 和 24 个月时的结果。101 例乳腺癌相关淋巴水肿患者中,81 例(保守治疗组 52 例,手术治疗组 29 例)纳入分析。与保守治疗组相比,手术治疗组的治疗效果明显更高,6 个月时水肿变化率为-6.6%±7.3%与 0.9%±7.5%(p<0.001),12 个月时为-7.3%±6.2%与 2.9%±8.6%(p<0.001),18 个月时为-7.6%±8.0%与 3.9%±9.2%(p<0.001),24 个月时为-5.6%±6.0%与 4.4%±10.7%(p<0.001)。保守治疗组的蜂窝织炎发生率增加(从 9.6%增加到 15.4%),而手术治疗组的蜂窝织炎发生率降低(从 13.8%降低到 0%)。以压迫治疗为中心的保守治疗会随着时间的推移增加水肿,而淋巴管静脉吻合术与压迫治疗联合可有效减轻水肿。