Department of General Surgery, Hangzhou TCM Hospital Affiliated to Zhejiang Chinese Medical University, 310007, Hangzhou, China.
Zhejiang Cancer Hospital, Hangzhou Institute of Medicine (HIM), Chinese Academy of Sciences, 310022, Hangzhou, China.
Int J Colorectal Dis. 2023 Dec 13;39(1):3. doi: 10.1007/s00384-023-04581-9.
To clarify whether the combination of age and high-risk factors (HRFs) was preferable for adjuvant chemotherapy (AC) decision-making in patients with stage II colon adenocarcinoma.
We conducted a retrospective study analyzing eligible colon cancer patients from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database between 2010 and 2017. A nomogram was used to predict patient prognosis. Decision curve analysis (DCA) predicted model clinical benefit. Restricted cubic spline calculated the optimal cut-off value.
A total of 8570 patients with stage II colon adenocarcinoma were included in this study; 25.2% received AC. A nomogram predicting the prognosis of patients with stage II colon adenocarcinoma was constructed with age and HRFs, and scores were assigned to the relevant variables. DCA showed that age combined with HRFs was superior to treatment decision-making based on HRFs alone. Patients were grouped according to their total score with the cut-off value of 100. AC did not significantly improve overall survival (OS) in low-score group (hazard ratios (HRs) 1.01, 95% confidence intervals (CIs) 0.86-1.18, p = 0.918). In high-score group, AC improved 5-year OS by about 7.6% (HR 0.73, 95% CI 0.61-0.88, p = 0.001). And high-score group mainly included patients aged < 50 years with two or more HRFs and patients aged ≥ 50 years with at least one HRF.
Age and HRFs could be preferable for determining the group of stage II colon adenocarcinoma patients who would benefit from AC. Patients aged < 50 years with two or more HRFs might be a potential benefit population for AC.
明确年龄与高危因素(HRFs)联合是否更适合用于辅助化疗(AC)决策制定。
我们对 2010 年至 2017 年期间来自监测、流行病学和最终结果(SEER)数据库的合格结肠癌患者进行了回顾性研究。使用列线图预测患者预后。决策曲线分析(DCA)预测模型的临床获益。限制立方样条计算最佳截断值。
共纳入 8570 例 II 期结肠癌患者,25.2%接受 AC。构建了一个预测 II 期结肠癌患者预后的列线图,包含年龄和 HRFs,并为相关变量分配分数。DCA 表明,年龄与 HRFs 联合用于治疗决策优于单独基于 HRFs 的决策。根据总评分(截断值为 100)对患者进行分组。在低评分组中,AC 并未显著改善总体生存(OS)(风险比(HR)1.01,95%置信区间(CI)0.86-1.18,p=0.918)。在高评分组中,AC 使 5 年 OS 提高了约 7.6%(HR 0.73,95%CI 0.61-0.88,p=0.001)。且高评分组主要包括年龄<50 岁且有两个或更多 HRFs 的患者,以及年龄≥50 岁且至少有一个 HRF 的患者。
年龄和 HRFs 可能更适合确定从 AC 中获益的 II 期结肠癌患者群体。年龄<50 岁且有两个或更多 HRFs 的患者可能是 AC 的潜在受益人群。